PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGEA.L vs. UBXX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGEA.L vs. UBXX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SGEA.L) and UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis (UBXX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SGEA.L is traded in GBP, while UBXX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UBXX.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGEA.L achieves a -5.97% return, which is significantly lower than UBXX.L's 2.18% return.


SGEA.L

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.31%
6M
-2.76%
YTD
-5.97%
1Y
-6.24%
3Y*
-0.41%
5Y*
-0.08%
10Y*
0.83%
ALL TIME*
-0.71%

UBXX.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.20%
6M
1.76%
YTD
2.18%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
7.61%
5Y*
2.43%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGEA.L vs. UBXX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SGEA.L
iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-5.97%-1.01%3.19%-0.97%3.25%-3.19%5.39%5.58%6.63%
UBXX.L
UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis
2.18%9.71%7.01%7.14%-11.07%-0.10%1.69%5.94%-1.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SGEA.L and UBXX.L is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2018

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGEA.L vs. UBXX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGEA.L
SGEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SGEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SGEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

UBXX.L
UBXX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
UBXX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBXX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBXX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
UBXX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBXX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGEA.L vs. UBXX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SGEA.L) and UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis (UBXX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGEA.LUBXX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.48

-0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

3.35

-4.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.30

15.33

-16.63

SGEA.L vs. UBXX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGEA.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.05, which is lower than the UBXX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGEA.L and UBXX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGEA.L vs. UBXX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGEA.L drawdown since its inception was -40.80%, which is greater than UBXX.L's maximum drawdown of -16.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGEA.L and UBXX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGEA.LUBXX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.80%

-16.83%

-23.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-1.93%

-6.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.30%

-2.59%

-7.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.30%

-16.83%

+6.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.69%

-0.28%

-9.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

-3.66%

-13.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

0.42%

+4.55%

Volatility

SGEA.L vs. UBXX.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SGEA.L) has a higher volatility of 1.81% compared to UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis (UBXX.L) at 0.46%. This indicates that SGEA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBXX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGEA.LUBXX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.81%

0.46%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.36%

2.34%

+2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.13%

2.85%

+3.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.97%

4.25%

+2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.02%

4.92%

+3.10%

SGEA.L vs. UBXX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGEA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than UBXX.L's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGEA.L vs. UBXX.L - Dividend Comparison

SGEA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than UBXX.L's 6.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGEA.L
iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.76%3.40%3.00%2.90%2.81%2.37%2.97%2.55%2.46%2.17%2.65%1.11%
UBXX.L
UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis
6.47%25.71%7.05%4.76%4.40%3.91%4.43%6.18%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGEA.L and UBXX.L have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UBXX.L is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UBXX.L is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGEA.L.

SGEA.L tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets Asia Local Currency Government Country Capped Index, while UBXX.L tracks J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Diversified 1-5 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGEA.L and 0.47% for UBXX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGEA.L and UBXX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer