SGEA.L vs. CBND.L
SGEA.L (iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and CBND.L (Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Government Bonds funds - SGEA.L tracks the iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) while CBND.L tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs China Government Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SGEA.L returned 0.02%/yr vs 3.21%/yr for CBND.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SGEA.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for CBND.L.
Performance
SGEA.L vs. CBND.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SGEA.L is traded in GBP, while CBND.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CBND.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGEA.L achieves a -6.30% return, which is significantly lower than CBND.L's 4.44% return.
SGEA.L
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- 6M
- -5.74%
- YTD
- -6.30%
- 1Y
- -7.02%
- 3Y*
- -0.14%
- 5Y*
- 0.02%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
CBND.L
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- 6.30%
- 3Y*
- 4.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.21%
- 10Y*
- —
SGEA.L vs. CBND.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGEA.L iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -6.30% | -1.01% | 3.19% | -0.97% | 3.25% | -3.19% | 5.39% | 0.53% |
CBND.L Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.44% | -2.44% | 6.50% | -3.78% | 6.10% | 8.62% | 5.51% | 0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGEA.L and CBND.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2019 | 0.60 |
The correlation between SGEA.L and CBND.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGEA.L vs. CBND.L — Risk / Return Rank
SGEA.L
CBND.L
SGEA.L vs. CBND.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SGEA.L) and Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CBND.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGEA.L | CBND.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.18 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 1.84 | -2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | 5.14 | -6.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGEA.L vs. CBND.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGEA.L drawdown since its inception was -40.80%, which is greater than CBND.L's maximum drawdown of -16.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGEA.L and CBND.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGEA.L | CBND.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.80% | -16.35% | -24.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -3.40% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.30% | -9.09% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.30% | -16.35% | +6.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.01% | -4.42% | -5.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.31% | -7.47% | -9.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 1.22% | +3.69% |
Volatility
SGEA.L vs. CBND.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SGEA.L) and Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CBND.L) have volatilities of 1.89% and 1.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGEA.L | CBND.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.89% | 1.90% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.38% | 4.90% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.18% | 6.39% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.98% | 7.92% | -0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.03% | 8.34% | -0.31% |
SGEA.L vs. CBND.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGEA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CBND.L's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGEA.L vs. CBND.L - Dividend Comparison
SGEA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than CBND.L's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBND.L Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.04% | 2.20% | 2.45% | 2.54% | 2.72% | 2.52% | 1.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGEA.L iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.60% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.90% | 2.81% | 2.37% | 2.97% | 2.55% | 2.46% | 2.17% | 2.65% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGEA.L and CBND.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBND.L is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBND.L is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGEA.L.
SGEA.L tracks iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while CBND.L tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs China Government Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGEA.L and 0.24% for CBND.L.
Find the right allocation for SGEA.L and CBND.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer