SGDLX vs. SGDM
SGDLX (Sprott Gold Equity Fund) and SGDM (Sprott Gold Miners ETF) are both Gold funds from Sprott. Over the past 5 years, SGDLX returned 17.77%/yr vs 18.08%/yr for SGDM. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SGDLX charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SGDM.
Performance
SGDLX vs. SGDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SGDLX having a -9.76% return and SGDM slightly higher at -9.42%.
SGDLX
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -5.08%
- 6M
- -16.10%
- YTD
- -9.76%
- 1Y
- 54.26%
- 3Y*
- 40.24%
- 5Y*
- 17.77%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.38%
SGDM
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- 6M
- -17.12%
- YTD
- -9.42%
- 1Y
- 41.25%
- 3Y*
- 37.27%
- 5Y*
- 18.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $1.66M | $1.82M | $2.93M |
SGDLX vs. SGDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGDLX Sprott Gold Equity Fund | -9.76% | 147.67% | 20.58% | 1.91% | -13.21% | -11.79% | 35.30% |
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | -9.42% | 153.46% | 12.14% | 2.34% | -8.23% | -9.15% | 26.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGDLX and SGDM is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SGDLX and SGDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGDLX vs. SGDM — Risk / Return Rank
SGDLX
SGDM
SGDLX vs. SGDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Gold Equity Fund (SGDLX) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGDLX | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.18 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 1.08 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.40 | 2.32 | +1.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGDLX vs. SGDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGDLX drawdown since its inception was -47.59%, smaller than the maximum SGDM drawdown of -54.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDLX and SGDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGDLX | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.59% | -54.95% | +7.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.46% | -38.29% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.46% | -38.29% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.98% | -45.06% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.07% | -33.84% | +1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.57% | -25.55% | +6.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.55% | 17.83% | -1.28% |
Volatility
SGDLX vs. SGDM - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Gold Equity Fund (SGDLX) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) have volatilities of 12.04% and 11.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGDLX | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.04% | 11.85% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.45% | 36.84% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.55% | 47.76% | -4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.46% | 36.56% | -4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.29% | 37.00% | -2.71% |
SGDLX vs. SGDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGDLX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than SGDM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGDLX vs. SGDM - Dividend Comparison
SGDLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than SGDM's 1.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGDLX Sprott Gold Equity Fund | 0.74% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 1.15% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.30% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.58% | 0.02% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SGDLX and SGDM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SGDLX has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to SGDM (11.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGDLX dropped -47.59% vs SGDM's -54.95%.
SGDLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGDLX and SGDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer