SGDJ vs. SLVO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SGDJ (Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF) and SLVO (UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - SGDJ is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while SLVO is a Silver fund tracking the Credit Suisse NASDAQ Silver FLOWS 106 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SGDJ returned 80.74% vs 62.53% for SLVO. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SGDJ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SLVO.

Performance

SGDJ vs. SLVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGDJ achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly lower than SLVO's 13.49% return.

SGDJ

• 1D: -3.43%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 1.97%
• 6M: 12.36%
• 1Y: 80.74%
• 3Y*: 49.76%
• 5Y*: 17.17%
• 10Y*: 11.97%

SLVO

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 4.05%
• YTD: 13.49%
• 6M: 17.86%
• 1Y: 62.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGDJ vs. SLVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF	1.97%	174.44%	1.13%
SLVO UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN	13.49%	71.20%	1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SGDJ and SLVO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2024	0.73

The correlation between SGDJ and SLVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SGDJ vs. SLVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGDJ

SGDJ Risk / Return Rank: 44
SGDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
SGDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SGDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 43
SGDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SGDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 40

SLVO

SLVO Risk / Return Rank: 66
SLVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SLVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SLVO Omega Ratio Rank: 72
SLVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SLVO Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGDJ vs. SLVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SGDJ	SLVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	2.13	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	2.39	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.44	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	3.65	-1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.48	15.01	-8.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SGDJ vs. SLVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGDJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the SLVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGDJ and SLVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SGDJ	SLVO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.68	2.13	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	1.61	-1.25

Drawdowns

SGDJ vs. SLVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGDJ drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than SLVO's maximum drawdown of -17.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDJ and SLVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGDJ	SLVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.27%	-17.23%	-42.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.22%	-17.23%	-15.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.66%	-3.22%	-22.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.25%	-3.13%	-23.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.50%	4.18%	+8.32%

Volatility

SGDJ vs. SLVO - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) has a higher volatility of 13.18% compared to UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) at 6.39%. This indicates that SGDJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SGDJ	SLVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.18%	6.39%	+6.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.87%	27.33%	+12.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.34%	29.53%	+18.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.28%	25.23%	+15.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.74%	25.23%	+15.51%

SGDJ vs. SLVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGDJ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

SGDJ vs. SLVO - Dividend Comparison

SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%, less than SLVO's 46.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF	8.21%	8.37%	6.55%	4.55%	2.46%	2.20%	1.97%	0.65%	0.00%	0.14%	1.77%	0.85%
SLVO UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN	46.44%	19.35%	14.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGDJ and SLVO in my portfolio?

SGDJ and SLVO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SGDJ or SLVO?

SGDJ has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to SLVO (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGDJ dropped -59.27% vs SLVO's -17.23%.

Which ETF is better, SGDJ or SLVO?

On 1-year performance, SGDJ leads with 80.74% vs 62.53% for SLVO. On fees, SGDJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SLVO has been the lower-risk option at 6.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SGDJ or SLVO?

Over the 1-year period, SGDJ has performed better with a 80.74% return vs 62.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SGDJ or SLVO?

SGDJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SLVO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SGDJ or SLVO?

SLVO has the higher dividend yield at 46.44%, compared with 8.21% for SGDJ.

What is the main difference between SGDJ and SLVO?

SGDJ is categorized as Materials, while SLVO is Silver. SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while SLVO tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ Silver FLOWS 106 Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGDJ and 0.65% for SLVO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.