PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGDJ vs. PSLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGDJ vs. PSLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGDJ achieves a -7.68% return, which is significantly higher than PSLV's -8.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SGDJ has underperformed PSLV with an annualized return of 10.84%, while PSLV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.13% annualized return.


SGDJ

1D
-9.79%
1M
-15.35%
YTD
-7.68%
6M
0.99%
1Y
61.13%
3Y*
44.58%
5Y*
14.87%
10Y*
10.84%

PSLV

1D
-8.15%
1M
-14.05%
YTD
-8.96%
6M
10.52%
1Y
80.47%
3Y*
38.41%
5Y*
16.65%
10Y*
13.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGDJ vs. PSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
-7.68%174.44%19.35%6.66%-27.60%-15.12%47.91%37.00%-25.63%5.94%
PSLV
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
-8.96%145.08%19.43%-1.94%2.74%-14.13%42.81%16.99%-11.83%4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SGDJ and PSLV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2015

0.73

The correlation between SGDJ and PSLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGDJ vs. PSLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGDJ
SGDJ Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SGDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

PSLV
PSLV Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGDJ vs. PSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGDJPSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.28

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

1.98

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.81

4.35

+0.46

SGDJ vs. PSLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGDJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the PSLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGDJ and PSLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGDJPSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.37

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.47

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.42

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.16

+0.18

Drawdowns

SGDJ vs. PSLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGDJ drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, smaller than the maximum PSLV drawdown of -79.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDJ and PSLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGDJPSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-79.38%

+20.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.22%

-40.79%

+7.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.22%

-40.79%

+7.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.90%

-40.79%

-14.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.27%

-42.79%

-16.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.69%

-40.79%

+8.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.25%

-58.14%

+31.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.77%

18.56%

-5.79%

Volatility

SGDJ vs. PSLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) is 15.21%, while Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) has a volatility of 17.38%. This indicates that SGDJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGDJPSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.21%

17.38%

-2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.20%

57.99%

-16.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.35%

59.10%

-9.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.50%

35.81%

+4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.85%

31.25%

+9.60%

SGDJ vs. PSLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGDJ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PSLV's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGDJ vs. PSLV - Dividend Comparison

SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.07%, while PSLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSLV
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
9.07%8.37%6.55%4.55%2.46%2.20%1.97%0.65%0.00%0.14%1.77%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGDJ and PSLV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSLV has higher volatility (17.38%) compared to SGDJ (15.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGDJ dropped -59.27% vs PSLV's -79.38%.

On 10-year performance, PSLV leads with 13.13% vs 10.84% for SGDJ. On fees, SGDJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SGDJ has been the lower-risk option at 15.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PSLV has performed better with a 13.13% return vs 10.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGDJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for PSLV.

SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 9.07%, compared with 0.00% for PSLV.

SGDJ is categorized as Materials, while PSLV is Silver. SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while PSLV tracks No Index (Physical Silver). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGDJ and 0.51% for PSLV.

PSLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGDJ and PSLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer