PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGDJ vs. EWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGDJ vs. EWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGDJ achieves a -5.68% return, which is significantly lower than EWP's 8.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SGDJ has underperformed EWP with an annualized return of 10.80%, while EWP has yielded a comparatively higher 12.33% annualized return.


SGDJ

1D
2.43%
1M
-17.01%
YTD
-5.68%
6M
-2.07%
1Y
66.21%
3Y*
47.78%
5Y*
15.18%
10Y*
10.80%

EWP

1D
0.63%
1M
4.32%
YTD
8.89%
6M
11.54%
1Y
39.17%
3Y*
32.21%
5Y*
17.57%
10Y*
12.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGDJ vs. EWP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
-5.68%174.44%19.35%6.66%-27.60%-15.12%47.91%37.00%-25.63%5.94%
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
8.89%78.03%5.70%30.26%-5.18%0.25%-3.94%11.93%-15.32%26.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SGDJ and EWP is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2015

0.25

The correlation between SGDJ and EWP shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SGDJ vs. EWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SGDJ
EWP

Basic Materials

100.0%

-

Communication Services

-

2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

5.3%

Financial Services

-

41.4%

Healthcare

-

1.3%

Industrials

-

16.1%

Real Estate

-

2.9%

Technology

-

4.9%

Utilities

-

21.2%

Basic Materials

SGDJ
100.0%
EWP

-

Communication Services

SGDJ

-

EWP
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SGDJ

-

EWP
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

SGDJ

-

EWP

-

Energy

SGDJ

-

EWP
5.3%

Financial Services

SGDJ

-

EWP
41.4%

Healthcare

SGDJ

-

EWP
1.3%

Industrials

SGDJ

-

EWP
16.1%

Real Estate

SGDJ

-

EWP
2.9%

Technology

SGDJ

-

EWP
4.9%

Utilities

SGDJ

-

EWP
21.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGDJ vs. EWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGDJ
SGDJ Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SGDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

EWP
EWP Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWP Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWP Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGDJ vs. EWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGDJEWPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

3.26

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.04

11.51

-6.47

SGDJ vs. EWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGDJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the EWP Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGDJ and EWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGDJ vs. EWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGDJ drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, roughly equal to the maximum EWP drawdown of -61.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDJ and EWP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGDJEWPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-61.19%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.84%

-11.38%

-25.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.84%

-12.19%

-24.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.68%

-33.76%

-19.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.27%

-46.36%

-12.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.23%

0.00%

-31.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.25%

-21.41%

-4.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.57%

3.22%

+10.35%

Volatility

SGDJ vs. EWP - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) has a higher volatility of 17.17% compared to iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) at 6.21%. This indicates that SGDJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGDJEWPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.17%

6.21%

+10.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.94%

16.09%

+25.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.96%

19.13%

+30.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.69%

20.31%

+20.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.92%

22.22%

+18.70%

SGDJ vs. EWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SGDJ and EWP have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

SGDJ vs. EWP - Dividend Comparison

SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.88%, more than EWP's 2.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
2.09%2.27%4.35%2.70%3.07%3.29%2.56%3.72%3.69%2.72%4.65%3.85%
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
8.88%8.37%6.55%4.55%2.46%2.20%1.97%0.65%0.00%0.14%1.77%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGDJ and EWP have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGDJ has higher volatility (17.17%) compared to EWP (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGDJ dropped -59.27% vs EWP's -61.19%.

On 10-year performance, EWP leads with 12.33% vs 10.80% for SGDJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, EWP has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWP has performed better with a 12.33% return vs 10.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGDJ and EWP have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 8.88%, compared with 2.09% for EWP.

SGDJ is categorized as Materials, while EWP is Europe Equities. SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while EWP tracks MSCI Spain Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and iShares.

EWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGDJ and EWP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer