PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGBX.L vs. GBSP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGBX.L vs. GBSP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Physical Swiss Gold (SGBX.L) and WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged (GBSP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGBX.L achieves a 3.86% return, which is significantly higher than GBSP.L's 3.18% return.


SGBX.L

1D
0.68%
1M
-3.57%
YTD
3.86%
6M
5.03%
1Y
34.31%
3Y*
28.08%
5Y*
19.84%
10Y*

GBSP.L

1D
0.76%
1M
-4.73%
YTD
3.18%
6M
5.42%
1Y
31.89%
3Y*
30.23%
5Y*
17.19%
10Y*
11.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGBX.L vs. GBSP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGBX.L
WisdomTree Physical Swiss Gold
3.86%53.55%28.13%7.24%12.36%-3.37%20.00%14.67%4.35%-3.78%
GBSP.L
WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged
3.18%63.29%25.01%11.75%-1.73%-4.92%21.84%14.56%-4.55%1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SGBX.L and GBSP.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2017

0.77

The correlation between SGBX.L and GBSP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGBX.L vs. GBSP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGBX.L
SGBX.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SGBX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGBX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGBX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SGBX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGBX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

GBSP.L
GBSP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GBSP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBSP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBSP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GBSP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBSP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGBX.L vs. GBSP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Swiss Gold (SGBX.L) and WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged (GBSP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGBX.LGBSP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

1.76

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.94

4.51

+0.44

SGBX.L vs. GBSP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGBX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the GBSP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGBX.L and GBSP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGBX.LGBSP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.25

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

0.99

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.38

+0.53

Drawdowns

SGBX.L vs. GBSP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGBX.L drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, smaller than the maximum GBSP.L drawdown of -37.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGBX.L and GBSP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGBX.LGBSP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.29%

-37.30%

+15.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.07%

-17.53%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.07%

-17.53%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.07%

-22.05%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.26%

-15.96%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-17.52%

+11.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.76%

6.88%

-0.12%

Volatility

SGBX.L vs. GBSP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Physical Swiss Gold (SGBX.L) is 5.08%, while WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged (GBSP.L) has a volatility of 6.25%. This indicates that SGBX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBSP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGBX.LGBSP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

6.25%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.94%

21.79%

-1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.13%

24.78%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

17.29%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.17%

15.56%

-0.39%

SGBX.L vs. GBSP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGBX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GBSP.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SGBX.L vs. GBSP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGBX.L nor GBSP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SGBX.L and GBSP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SGBX.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SGBX.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GBSP.L.

SGBX.L tracks Gold, while GBSP.L tracks Gold (GBP Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SGBX.L and 0.25% for GBSP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGBX.L and GBSP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer