SGBX.L vs. DGRA.L
SGBX.L (WisdomTree Physical Swiss Gold) and DGRA.L (WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SGBX.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while DGRA.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SGBX.L returned 19.84%/yr vs 12.90%/yr for DGRA.L. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGBX.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for DGRA.L.
Performance
SGBX.L vs. DGRA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SGBX.L is traded in GBp, while DGRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DGRA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGBX.L achieves a 3.86% return, which is significantly lower than DGRA.L's 7.16% return.
SGBX.L
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -3.57%
- YTD
- 3.86%
- 6M
- 5.03%
- 1Y
- 34.31%
- 3Y*
- 28.08%
- 5Y*
- 19.84%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRA.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 20.43%
- 3Y*
- 13.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- —
SGBX.L vs. DGRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGBX.L WisdomTree Physical Swiss Gold | 3.86% | 53.55% | 28.13% | 7.24% | 12.36% | -3.37% | 20.00% | 14.67% | 4.35% | -3.78% |
DGRA.L WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc | 7.16% | 5.03% | 20.29% | 12.77% | 2.58% | 26.46% | 9.27% | 23.93% | -1.02% | 11.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGBX.L and DGRA.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2017 | 0.01 |
The correlation between SGBX.L and DGRA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (5 years) to 0.07 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGBX.L vs. DGRA.L — Risk / Return Rank
SGBX.L
DGRA.L
SGBX.L vs. DGRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Swiss Gold (SGBX.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGBX.L | DGRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 3.76 | -1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.94 | 12.08 | -7.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGBX.L | DGRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 1.85 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 0.92 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.93 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
SGBX.L vs. DGRA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGBX.L drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRA.L drawdown of -23.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGBX.L and DGRA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGBX.L | DGRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.29% | -23.29% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.07% | -5.57% | -12.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.07% | -18.00% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.07% | -18.00% | -0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.26% | 0.00% | -16.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.07% | -2.98% | -3.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.76% | 1.74% | +5.02% |
Volatility
SGBX.L vs. DGRA.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Physical Swiss Gold (SGBX.L) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L) at 3.18%. This indicates that SGBX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGBX.L | DGRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 3.18% | +1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.94% | 8.41% | +11.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.13% | 11.31% | +11.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 14.01% | +2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 15.54% | -0.37% |
SGBX.L vs. DGRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGBX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRA.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGBX.L vs. DGRA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGBX.L nor DGRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SGBX.L and DGRA.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGBX.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGBX.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for DGRA.L.
SGBX.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while DGRA.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. SGBX.L tracks Gold, while DGRA.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SGBX.L and 0.33% for DGRA.L.
Find the right allocation for SGBX.L and DGRA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer