SGARX vs. PRGSX
SGARX (Virtus SGA Global Growth Fund) and PRGSX (T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, SGARX returned 1.45%/yr vs 10.12%/yr for PRGSX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SGARX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for PRGSX.
Performance
SGARX vs. PRGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGARX achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly lower than PRGSX's 23.78% return.
SGARX
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- -3.32%
- 6M
- -2.19%
- 1Y
- -1.92%
- 3Y*
- 7.35%
- 5Y*
- 1.45%
- 10Y*
- —
PRGSX
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 10.17%
- YTD
- 23.78%
- 6M
- 24.65%
- 1Y
- 44.27%
- 3Y*
- 24.53%
- 5Y*
- 10.12%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
SGARX vs. PRGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGARX Virtus SGA Global Growth Fund | -3.32% | 3.75% | 9.88% | 27.17% | -25.69% | 8.31% | 31.26% | 11.44% |
PRGSX T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund | 23.78% | 21.42% | 16.80% | 25.70% | -28.01% | 9.81% | 52.29% | 13.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGARX and PRGSX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SGARX and PRGSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGARX vs. PRGSX — Risk / Return Rank
SGARX
PRGSX
SGARX vs. PRGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus SGA Global Growth Fund (SGARX) and T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGARX | PRGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.44 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 3.48 | -3.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.30 | 14.22 | -14.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGARX | PRGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | 2.48 | -2.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.52 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.53 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
SGARX vs. PRGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGARX drawdown since its inception was -37.07%, smaller than the maximum PRGSX drawdown of -64.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGARX and PRGSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGARX | PRGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.07% | -64.06% | +26.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.38% | -12.77% | -6.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.86% | -21.13% | -12.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.07% | -38.11% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.63% | 0.00% | -22.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -13.48% | +0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.85% | 3.11% | +3.74% |
Volatility
SGARX vs. PRGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus SGA Global Growth Fund (SGARX) is 3.07%, while T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that SGARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGARX | PRGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 5.50% | -2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.18% | 14.84% | -3.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.09% | 17.93% | -3.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.57% | 19.66% | +3.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.43% | 19.77% | +3.66% |
SGARX vs. PRGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGARX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than PRGSX's 0.82% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGARX vs. PRGSX - Dividend Comparison
SGARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.20%, more than PRGSX's 7.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGSX T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund | 7.76% | 9.60% | 6.73% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 13.67% | 5.67% | 2.21% | 5.81% | 0.03% | 0.63% | 0.33% |
SGARX Virtus SGA Global Growth Fund | 13.20% | 12.76% | 25.64% | 0.00% | 2.52% | 6.86% | 3.18% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGARX and PRGSX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRGSX has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to SGARX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGARX dropped -37.07% vs PRGSX's -64.06%.
PRGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGARX and PRGSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer