SFYX vs. QQJG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG).

SFYX and QQJG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SFYX is a passively managed fund by Toroso Investments that tracks the performance of the Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index. It was launched on Apr 11, 2019. QQJG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 ESG Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Oct 27, 2021. Both SFYX and QQJG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SFYX vs. QQJG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SFYX vs. QQJG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF	5.66%	14.25%	14.45%	17.70%	-22.88%	-1.17%
QQJG Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	1.44%	18.05%	14.67%	17.20%	-27.69%	0.91%

Returns By Period

SFYX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQJG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 3.25%
• 1Y: 27.88%
• 3Y*: 14.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFYX vs. QQJG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFYX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QQJG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

QQJG

Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF

SFYX

SoFi Next 500 ETF

Return for Risk

SFYX vs. QQJG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQJG

QQJG Risk / Return Rank: 70
QQJG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
QQJG Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
QQJG Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QQJG Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QQJG Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFYX vs. QQJG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SFYX	QQJG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.17	—

Correlation

The correlation between SFYX and QQJG is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SFYX vs. QQJG - Dividend Comparison

SFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than QQJG's 13.86% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF	1.36%	1.44%	1.25%	1.51%	1.56%	0.90%	1.16%	1.02%
QQJG Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	13.86%	0.68%	0.65%	0.54%	0.70%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SFYX	QQJG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-36.76%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-2.09%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-15.84%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.97%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SFYX	QQJG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.78%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	21.80%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	22.12%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	22.12%	—