SFYX vs. QMOM
SFYX (SoFi Next 500 ETF) and QMOM (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFYX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index, while QMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. SFYX is passively managed, while QMOM is actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SFYX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QMOM.
Performance
SFYX vs. QMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SFYX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QMOM
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 6.10%
- YTD
- 24.65%
- 6M
- 26.71%
- 1Y
- 31.51%
- 3Y*
- 23.22%
- 5Y*
- 11.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.82%
SFYX vs. QMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF | 5.66% | 14.25% | 14.45% | 17.70% | -22.88% | 18.89% | 17.63% | 6.95% |
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF | 24.65% | 2.36% | 30.43% | 9.50% | -6.99% | -4.06% | 61.94% | 8.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFYX and QMOM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019 | 0.75 |
The correlation between SFYX and QMOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SFYX vs. QMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SFYX
QMOM
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Industrials
SFYX
QMOM
Technology
SFYX
QMOM
Financial Services
SFYX
QMOM
Healthcare
SFYX
QMOM
Consumer Cyclical
SFYX
QMOM
Real Estate
SFYX
QMOM
-
Communication Services
SFYX
QMOM
Energy
SFYX
QMOM
Basic Materials
SFYX
QMOM
Consumer Defensive
SFYX
QMOM
Utilities
SFYX
QMOM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFYX vs. QMOM — Risk / Return Rank
SFYX
QMOM
SFYX vs. QMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFYX | QMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.52 | — |
Drawdowns
SFYX vs. QMOM - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFYX | QMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -39.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.37% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -12.92% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.45% | — |
Volatility
SFYX vs. QMOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFYX | QMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 23.30% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 24.19% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 26.49% | — |
SFYX vs. QMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFYX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QMOM's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFYX vs. QMOM - Dividend Comparison
SFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than QMOM's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF | 0.44% | 0.54% | 1.40% | 0.87% | 1.59% | 0.12% | 0.08% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.13% | 0.34% |
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF | 1.36% | 1.44% | 1.25% | 1.51% | 1.56% | 0.90% | 1.16% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFYX and QMOM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SFYX is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SFYX is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QMOM.
SFYX has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.44% for QMOM.
SFYX is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while QMOM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SFYX and 0.28% for QMOM.
Find the right allocation for SFYX and QMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer