SFYI vs. PEPS
SFYI (SoFi Social 50 Income ETF) and PEPS (Parametric Equity Plus ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. SFYI charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for PEPS.
Performance
SFYI vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SFYI
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEPS
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- YTD
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 25.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFYI vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SFYI SoFi Social 50 Income ETF | 0.03% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFYI and PEPS is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | -1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFYI vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank
SFYI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PEPS
SFYI vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Social 50 Income ETF (SFYI) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFYI | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.49 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFYI vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFYI drawdown since its inception was -0.10%, smaller than the maximum PEPS drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFYI and PEPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFYI | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -21.26% | +21.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -1.11% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -2.73% | +2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.21% | — |
Volatility
SFYI vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFYI | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66% | 13.80% | -11.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.66% | 18.26% | -15.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.66% | 18.26% | -15.60% |
SFYI vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFYI has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFYI vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison
SFYI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PEPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 0.93% | 1.00% | 0.17% |
SFYI SoFi Social 50 Income ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFYI and PEPS have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for SFYI.
PEPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.00% for SFYI.
They also come from different issuers: Tidal and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for SFYI and 0.10% for PEPS.
Find the right allocation for SFYI and PEPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer