SFYI vs. ARMW
SFYI (SoFi Social 50 Income ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. SFYI charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.
Performance
SFYI vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SFYI
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMW
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -17.41%
- 6M
- 189.52%
- YTD
- 210.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFYI vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SFYI SoFi Social 50 Income ETF | 0.03% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | -8.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFYI and ARMW is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | -1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFYI vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Social 50 Income ETF (SFYI) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFYI vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFYI drawdown since its inception was -0.10%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFYI and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFYI | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -48.47% | +48.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -37.52% | +37.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -25.52% | +25.47% |
Volatility
SFYI vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFYI | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66% | 94.24% | -91.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.66% | 94.24% | -91.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.66% | 94.24% | -91.58% |
SFYI vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFYI has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFYI vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
SFYI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 40.20% | 16.38% |
SFYI SoFi Social 50 Income ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFYI and ARMW have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SFYI is cheaper at 0.73% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SFYI is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.
ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 40.20%, compared with 0.00% for SFYI.
They also come from different issuers: Tidal and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for SFYI and 0.99% for ARMW.
Find the right allocation for SFYI and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer