PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFTX vs. NVIR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFTX vs. NVIR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX) and Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SFTX having a 22.26% return and NVIR slightly lower at 22.17%.


SFTX

1D
-0.29%
1M
7.93%
YTD
22.26%
6M
24.22%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVIR

1D
0.66%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
22.17%
6M
19.29%
1Y
34.67%
3Y*
19.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFTX vs. NVIR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SFTX and NVIR is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.11

SFTX vs. NVIR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SFTX
NVIR

Technology

28.2%
2.6%

Financial Services

16.2%

-

Industrials

12.1%
11.1%

Healthcare

10.1%
1.1%

Basic Materials

8.6%
1.6%

Energy

8.0%
78.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%

-

Communication Services

4.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.7%

-

Utilities

1.9%
3.1%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Technology

SFTX
28.2%
NVIR
2.6%

Financial Services

SFTX
16.2%
NVIR

-

Industrials

SFTX
12.1%
NVIR
11.1%

Healthcare

SFTX
10.1%
NVIR
1.1%

Basic Materials

SFTX
8.6%
NVIR
1.6%

Energy

SFTX
8.0%
NVIR
78.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SFTX
5.9%
NVIR

-

Communication Services

SFTX
4.5%
NVIR

-

Consumer Defensive

SFTX
3.7%
NVIR

-

Utilities

SFTX
1.9%
NVIR
3.1%

Real Estate

SFTX
0.9%
NVIR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFTX vs. NVIR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFTX

NVIR
NVIR Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NVIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVIR Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
NVIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVIR Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFTX vs. NVIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX) and Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SFTX vs. NVIR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFTXNVIRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.57

0.90

+1.67

Drawdowns

SFTX vs. NVIR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFTX drawdown since its inception was -12.75%, smaller than the maximum NVIR drawdown of -22.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFTX and NVIR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFTXNVIRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.75%

-22.47%

+9.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-3.08%

+2.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-4.58%

+1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

Volatility

SFTX vs. NVIR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFTXNVIRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.65%

16.05%

+5.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.65%

19.24%

+2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.65%

19.24%

+2.41%

SFTX vs. NVIR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFTX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than NVIR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFTX vs. NVIR - Dividend Comparison

SFTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than NVIR's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
NVIR
Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF
0.75%0.92%1.50%1.34%
SFTX
Horizon International Managed Risk ETF
0.20%0.25%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFTX and NVIR have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SFTX is cheaper at 0.82% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SFTX is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NVIR.

NVIR has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.20% for SFTX.

SFTX is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while NVIR is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for SFTX and 0.85% for NVIR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFTX and NVIR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer