PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFSNX vs. VSTCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFSNX vs. VSTCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund (VSTCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFSNX achieves a 15.97% return, which is significantly lower than VSTCX's 18.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SFSNX has underperformed VSTCX with an annualized return of 10.97%, while VSTCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.71% annualized return.


SFSNX

1D
1.06%
1M
3.41%
YTD
15.97%
6M
15.35%
1Y
32.31%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
10.97%

VSTCX

1D
0.58%
1M
3.68%
YTD
18.22%
6M
18.42%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
22.14%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
12.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFSNX vs. VSTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SFSNX
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund
15.97%7.66%8.99%20.15%-14.79%30.91%8.49%24.44%-12.26%12.84%
VSTCX
Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund
18.22%15.20%15.40%21.34%-13.00%33.53%8.38%22.18%-11.87%9.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SFSNX and VSTCX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.98

The correlation between SFSNX and VSTCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

SFSNX vs. VSTCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SFSNX
VSTCX

Industrials

19.1%
16.1%

Technology

15.1%
14.9%

Financial Services

14.5%
18.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
11.1%

Real Estate

9.8%
6.5%

Healthcare

6.8%
14.1%

Energy

6.1%
6.2%

Basic Materials

5.2%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
3.0%

Communication Services

4.2%
2.4%

Utilities

2.8%
2.3%

Industrials

SFSNX
19.1%
VSTCX
16.1%

Technology

SFSNX
15.1%
VSTCX
14.9%

Financial Services

SFSNX
14.5%
VSTCX
18.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SFSNX
12.2%
VSTCX
11.1%

Real Estate

SFSNX
9.8%
VSTCX
6.5%

Healthcare

SFSNX
6.8%
VSTCX
14.1%

Energy

SFSNX
6.1%
VSTCX
6.2%

Basic Materials

SFSNX
5.2%
VSTCX
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

SFSNX
4.2%
VSTCX
3.0%

Communication Services

SFSNX
4.2%
VSTCX
2.4%

Utilities

SFSNX
2.8%
VSTCX
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFSNX vs. VSTCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFSNX
SFSNX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SFSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
SFSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VSTCX
VSTCX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VSTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VSTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFSNX vs. VSTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund (VSTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFSNXVSTCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.43

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

5.44

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.81

19.17

-7.36

SFSNX vs. VSTCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFSNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the VSTCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFSNX and VSTCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFSNXVSTCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

2.50

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.54

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.54

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.38

+0.01

Drawdowns

SFSNX vs. VSTCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFSNX drawdown since its inception was -58.32%, smaller than the maximum VSTCX drawdown of -62.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFSNX and VSTCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFSNXVSTCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.32%

-62.50%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-8.08%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.91%

-27.47%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.91%

-27.47%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.82%

-48.08%

+3.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.32%

-10.65%

+2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

2.29%

+0.60%

Volatility

SFSNX vs. VSTCX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund (VSTCX) have volatilities of 4.54% and 4.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFSNXVSTCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

4.49%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.80%

11.97%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.10%

17.57%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.81%

21.99%

-1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.28%

23.47%

-0.19%

SFSNX vs. VSTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFSNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than VSTCX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SFSNX vs. VSTCX - Dividend Comparison

SFSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than VSTCX's 6.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFSNX
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund
1.18%1.36%1.71%1.37%7.05%12.27%1.42%3.66%11.55%6.88%1.86%6.37%
VSTCX
Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund
6.38%7.55%9.66%2.50%7.44%19.92%1.24%4.14%11.74%5.76%1.35%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SFSNX and VSTCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SFSNX has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to VSTCX (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFSNX dropped -58.32% vs VSTCX's -62.50%.

VSTCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFSNX and VSTCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer