SFSNX vs. SWPPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SFSNX (Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund) and SWPPX (Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - SFSNX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Charles Schwab, while SWPPX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, SFSNX returned 10.97%/yr vs 15.63%/yr for SWPPX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFSNX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SWPPX.

Performance

SFSNX vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFSNX achieves a 15.97% return, which is significantly higher than SWPPX's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, SFSNX has underperformed SWPPX with an annualized return of 10.97%, while SWPPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.63% annualized return.

SFSNX

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 3.41%
• YTD: 15.97%
• 6M: 15.35%
• 1Y: 32.31%
• 3Y*: 16.22%
• 5Y*: 7.30%
• 10Y*: 10.97%

SWPPX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 5.83%
• YTD: 11.69%
• 6M: 11.71%
• 1Y: 28.97%
• 3Y*: 22.73%
• 5Y*: 14.26%
• 10Y*: 15.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFSNX vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SFSNX Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund	15.97%	7.66%	8.99%	20.15%	-14.79%	30.91%	8.49%	24.44%	-12.26%	12.84%
SWPPX Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund	11.69%	17.87%	24.96%	26.26%	-18.14%	28.67%	18.38%	31.46%	-4.47%	21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SFSNX and SWPPX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008	0.85

The correlation between SFSNX and SWPPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SFSNX vs. SWPPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SFSNX	SWPPX
Industrials	19.1%	8.3%
Technology	15.1%	35.6%
Financial Services	14.5%	11.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	10.1%
Real Estate	9.8%	1.9%
Healthcare	6.8%	8.5%
Energy	6.1%	3.5%
Basic Materials	5.2%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	4.9%
Communication Services	4.2%	11.2%
Utilities	2.8%	2.4%

Return for Risk

SFSNX vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFSNX

SFSNX Risk / Return Rank: 55
SFSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SFSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
SFSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
SFSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
SFSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

SWPPX

SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 73
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFSNX vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SFSNX	SWPPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	2.52	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	3.41	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.46	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.63	3.36	+0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.81	15.67	-3.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SFSNX vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFSNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFSNX and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SFSNX	SWPPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	2.52	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.85	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.86	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.51	-0.12

Drawdowns

SFSNX vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFSNX drawdown since its inception was -58.32%, which is greater than SWPPX's maximum drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFSNX and SWPPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SFSNX	SWPPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.32%	-55.06%	-3.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.43%	-8.89%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.91%	-18.74%	-7.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.91%	-24.51%	-1.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.82%	-33.80%	-11.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.32%	-9.95%	+1.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	1.90%	+0.99%

Volatility

SFSNX vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) at 2.83%. This indicates that SFSNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SFSNX	SWPPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.54%	2.83%	+1.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.80%	8.98%	+2.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.10%	11.87%	+5.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.81%	16.93%	+3.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.28%	18.23%	+5.05%

SFSNX vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFSNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SFSNX vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

SFSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than SWPPX's 0.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SFSNX Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund	1.18%	1.36%	1.71%	1.37%	7.05%	12.27%	1.42%	3.66%	11.55%	6.88%	1.86%	6.37%
SWPPX Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund	0.99%	1.11%	1.23%	1.43%	1.67%	1.27%	1.81%	1.95%	2.67%	1.79%	2.55%	3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SFSNX and SWPPX in my portfolio?

SFSNX and SWPPX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SFSNX or SWPPX?

SFSNX has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to SWPPX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFSNX dropped -58.32% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.