PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFSNX vs. SFENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFSNX vs. SFENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index Fund (SFENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFSNX achieves a 15.97% return, which is significantly lower than SFENX's 17.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SFSNX having a 10.97% annualized return and SFENX not far ahead at 11.44%.


SFSNX

1D
1.06%
1M
3.41%
YTD
15.97%
6M
15.35%
1Y
32.31%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
10.97%

SFENX

1D
1.76%
1M
4.72%
YTD
17.28%
6M
18.13%
1Y
39.03%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
10.10%
10Y*
11.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFSNX vs. SFENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SFSNX
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund
15.97%7.66%8.99%20.15%-14.79%30.91%8.49%24.44%-12.26%12.84%
SFENX
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index Fund
17.28%29.19%12.31%14.90%-15.50%13.91%-3.01%19.46%-9.96%26.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SFSNX and SFENX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

0.64

The correlation between SFSNX and SFENX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFSNX vs. SFENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFSNX
SFSNX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SFSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
SFSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

SFENX
SFENX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SFENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFENX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SFENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFENX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFSNX vs. SFENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index Fund (SFENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFSNXSFENXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.56

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

4.24

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.81

15.52

-3.71

SFSNX vs. SFENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFSNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is lower than the SFENX Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFSNX and SFENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFSNXSFENXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

3.02

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.66

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.68

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.44

-0.05

Drawdowns

SFSNX vs. SFENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFSNX drawdown since its inception was -58.32%, which is greater than SFENX's maximum drawdown of -47.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFSNX and SFENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFSNXSFENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.32%

-47.19%

-11.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-9.45%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.91%

-16.51%

-9.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.91%

-29.26%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.82%

-39.59%

-5.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.32%

-12.89%

+4.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

2.58%

+0.31%

Volatility

SFSNX vs. SFENX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index Fund (SFENX) have volatilities of 4.54% and 4.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFSNXSFENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

4.55%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.80%

10.71%

+1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.10%

13.27%

+3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.81%

15.41%

+5.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.28%

16.92%

+6.36%

SFSNX vs. SFENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFSNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SFENX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFSNX vs. SFENX - Dividend Comparison

SFSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than SFENX's 3.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFENX
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index Fund
3.35%3.93%4.67%5.00%5.46%4.61%2.95%3.82%2.90%2.37%2.16%3.23%
SFSNX
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund
1.18%1.36%1.71%1.37%7.05%12.27%1.42%3.66%11.55%6.88%1.86%6.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFSNX and SFENX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFENX has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to SFSNX (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFSNX dropped -58.32% vs SFENX's -47.19%.

SFENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFSNX and SFENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer