SFNNX vs. SICNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) and Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX).
SFNNX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Apr 1, 2007. SICNX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on May 30, 2008.
Performance
SFNNX vs. SICNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SFNNX vs. SICNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFNNX Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund | 7.49% | 41.06% | 2.27% | 19.88% | -7.95% | 14.38% | 4.35% | 18.09% | -13.96% | 23.95% |
SICNX Schwab International Core Equity Fund | 1.58% | 31.57% | 9.04% | 20.00% | -15.31% | 11.01% | 4.64% | 19.16% | -18.30% | 25.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFNNX achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly higher than SICNX's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SFNNX has outperformed SICNX with an annualized return of 10.98%, while SICNX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.35% annualized return.
SFNNX
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -6.45%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 15.84%
- 1Y
- 39.13%
- 3Y*
- 20.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.98%
SICNX
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 22.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SFNNX vs. SICNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFNNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SICNX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SFNNX vs. SICNX — Risk / Return Rank
SFNNX
SICNX
SFNNX vs. SICNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) and Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SFNNX | SICNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.40 | 1.23 | +1.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.03 | 1.62 | +1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.25 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 1.65 | +1.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.20 | 6.13 | +7.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFNNX | SICNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 1.23 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.62 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.51 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between SFNNX and SICNX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SFNNX vs. SICNX - Dividend Comparison
SFNNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, while SICNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFNNX Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund | 4.76% | 5.11% | 3.61% | 3.26% | 2.92% | 3.81% | 2.42% | 3.69% | 3.51% | 2.70% | 3.21% | 2.92% |
SICNX Schwab International Core Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.61% | 2.67% | 3.42% | 2.86% | 1.03% | 3.56% | 2.86% | 2.61% | 2.50% | 2.04% |
Drawdowns
SFNNX vs. SICNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFNNX drawdown since its inception was -59.60%, which is greater than SICNX's maximum drawdown of -55.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFNNX and SICNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFNNX | SICNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.60% | -55.78% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.96% | -12.21% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -29.11% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.23% | -40.62% | +0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.73% | -9.28% | +1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.06% | -12.28% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 3.28% | -0.40% |
Volatility
SFNNX vs. SICNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) is 7.48%, while Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) has a volatility of 7.99%. This indicates that SFNNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SICNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SFNNX | SICNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 7.99% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 13.12% | -2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.49% | 18.25% | -1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.46% | 15.92% | -0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 16.40% | +0.88% |