PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFNNX vs. HJPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFNNX vs. HJPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) and Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund (HJPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFNNX achieves a 21.09% return, which is significantly higher than HJPSX's 14.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SFNNX has outperformed HJPSX with an annualized return of 11.86%, while HJPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.57% annualized return.


SFNNX

1D
-0.36%
1M
5.59%
YTD
21.09%
6M
24.53%
1Y
44.46%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*
11.86%

HJPSX

1D
0.95%
1M
4.73%
YTD
14.89%
6M
18.45%
1Y
30.85%
3Y*
20.52%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*
10.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFNNX vs. HJPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SFNNX
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund
21.09%41.06%2.27%19.88%-7.95%14.38%4.35%18.09%-13.96%23.95%
HJPSX
Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund
14.89%29.02%8.24%16.30%-16.35%-4.64%13.43%19.97%-12.56%49.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SFNNX and HJPSX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.57

The correlation between SFNNX and HJPSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.70 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFNNX vs. HJPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFNNX
SFNNX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SFNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SFNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

HJPSX
HJPSX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
HJPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HJPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HJPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
HJPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
HJPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFNNX vs. HJPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) and Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund (HJPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFNNXHJPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.33

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

2.17

+2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.95

6.70

+9.26

SFNNX vs. HJPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFNNX Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is higher than the HJPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFNNX and HJPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFNNXHJPSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.15

1.85

+1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.49

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.60

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.52

-0.24

Drawdowns

SFNNX vs. HJPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFNNX drawdown since its inception was -59.60%, which is greater than HJPSX's maximum drawdown of -47.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFNNX and HJPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFNNXHJPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.60%

-47.91%

-11.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-14.77%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.78%

-14.77%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-33.24%

+7.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.23%

-34.80%

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-2.82%

+2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.97%

-10.06%

-1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

4.78%

-1.96%

Volatility

SFNNX vs. HJPSX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund (HJPSX) at 4.12%. This indicates that SFNNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HJPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFNNXHJPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

4.12%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

13.34%

-1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.34%

17.36%

-3.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.56%

17.24%

-1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

17.74%

-0.45%

SFNNX vs. HJPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFNNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HJPSX's 1.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFNNX vs. HJPSX - Dividend Comparison

SFNNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than HJPSX's 11.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HJPSX
Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund
11.53%13.25%3.64%0.85%0.61%0.43%0.23%1.30%3.46%2.09%2.03%3.34%
SFNNX
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund
4.22%5.11%3.61%3.26%2.92%3.81%2.42%3.69%3.51%2.70%3.21%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFNNX and HJPSX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFNNX has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to HJPSX (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFNNX dropped -59.60% vs HJPSX's -47.91%.

SFNNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFNNX and HJPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer