SFM vs. FFH.TO
SFM (Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.) and FFH.TO (Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited) are both stocks. SFM operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive), while FFH.TO operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, SFM returned 14.32%/yr vs 14.21%/yr for FFH.TO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SFM vs. FFH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SFM is traded in USD, while FFH.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the FFH.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFM achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly higher than FFH.TO's -14.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SFM having a 14.32% annualized return and FFH.TO not far behind at 14.21%.
SFM
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 8.36%
- 6M
- 8.54%
- 1Y
- -45.33%
- 3Y*
- 35.31%
- 5Y*
- 24.38%
- 10Y*
- 14.32%
FFH.TO
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- -14.49%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- -5.72%
- 3Y*
- 31.70%
- 5Y*
- 30.36%
- 10Y*
- 14.21%
SFM vs. FFH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFM Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. | 8.36% | -37.30% | 164.12% | 48.63% | 9.06% | 47.66% | 3.88% | -17.69% | -3.45% | 28.70% |
FFH.TO Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited | -14.49% | 38.55% | 53.28% | 58.73% | 23.67% | 47.33% | -25.54% | 8.10% | -15.60% | 13.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFM and FFH.TO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013 | 0.06 |
Fundamentals
SFM:
$8.25B
FFH.TO:
CA$50.62B
SFM:
$5.20
FFH.TO:
$205.21
SFM:
16.62
FFH.TO:
7.89
SFM:
0.60
FFH.TO:
0.13
SFM:
0.95
FFH.TO:
1.22
SFM:
5.75
FFH.TO:
1.40
SFM:
$8.90B
FFH.TO:
$29.34B
SFM:
$3.41B
FFH.TO:
$6.18B
SFM:
$837.54M
FFH.TO:
$7.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFM vs. FFH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SFM
FFH.TO
SFM vs. FFH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) and Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (FFH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFM | FFH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 0.99 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | -0.23 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | -0.49 | -0.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFM vs. FFH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFM drawdown since its inception was -72.88%, which is greater than FFH.TO's maximum drawdown of -59.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFM and FFH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFM | FFH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.88% | -59.23% | -13.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.17% | -19.52% | -42.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.48% | -19.52% | -43.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.48% | -20.30% | -43.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.48% | -59.23% | -4.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.91% | -14.82% | -37.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.28% | -11.26% | -29.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.41% | 8.95% | +36.46% |
Volatility
SFM vs. FFH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) has a higher volatility of 12.50% compared to Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (FFH.TO) at 5.85%. This indicates that SFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFM | FFH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.50% | 5.85% | +6.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.32% | 17.41% | +12.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.09% | 22.76% | +23.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.23% | 24.69% | +14.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.82% | 26.45% | +11.37% |
Dividends
SFM vs. FFH.TO - Dividend Comparison
SFM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFH.TO Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited | 0.92% | 0.83% | 1.01% | 1.10% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 3.01% | 2.18% | 2.07% | 1.95% | 2.24% | 1.82% |
SFM Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SFM vs. FFH.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. and Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SFM vs. FFH.TO - Profitability Comparison
SFM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported a gross profit of 917.28M and revenue of 2.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.
FFH.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 986.70M and revenue of 6.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.
SFM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported an operating income of 215.31M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
FFH.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 1.04B and revenue of 6.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
SFM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported a net income of 163.72M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.
FFH.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited reported a net income of 695.70M and revenue of 6.41B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SFM and FFH.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SFM and FFH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer