SFLR vs. POCT
SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) and POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) are both exchange-traded funds - SFLR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while POCT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index. SFLR is actively managed, while POCT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SFLR returned 13.20%/yr vs 11.51%/yr for POCT. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for POCT.
Performance
SFLR vs. POCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFLR achieves a 4.20% return, which is significantly lower than POCT's 6.44% return.
SFLR
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 4.20%
- 1Y
- 13.26%
- 3Y*
- 13.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.75%
POCT
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 5.73%
- YTD
- 6.44%
- 1Y
- 12.30%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.89%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.31M | $1.79M | $3.31M | |
| $6.54M | $8.39M | $12.78M |
SFLR vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 4.20% | 13.29% | 19.99% | 21.20% | 0.42% |
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 6.44% | 11.00% | 9.54% | 20.12% | 1.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFLR and POCT is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2022 | 0.86 |
The correlation between SFLR and POCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFLR vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank
SFLR
POCT
SFLR vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFLR | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.36 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 2.64 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.53 | 13.23 | -6.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFLR vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFLR drawdown since its inception was -12.13%, smaller than the maximum POCT drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLR and POCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFLR | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.13% | -18.80% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.79% | -4.40% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.13% | -10.22% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | 0.00% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.74% | -1.48% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 0.88% | +0.95% |
Volatility
SFLR vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) at 1.48%. This indicates that SFLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFLR | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 1.48% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.55% | 4.98% | +2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.93% | 6.26% | +3.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.27% | 8.00% | +2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.27% | 10.15% | +0.12% |
SFLR vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than POCT's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFLR vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison
SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while POCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.21% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 0.28% | 0.33% | 0.42% | 1.16% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFLR and POCT have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SFLR has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to POCT (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFLR dropped -12.13% vs POCT's -18.80%.
On 3-year performance, SFLR leads with 13.20% vs 11.51% for POCT. On fees, POCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, POCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SFLR has performed better with a 13.20% return vs 11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
POCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.
SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.00% for POCT.
SFLR is categorized as Options Trading, while POCT is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for SFLR and 0.79% for POCT.
POCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFLR and POCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer