SFLR vs. POCT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) and POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) are both exchange-traded funds - SFLR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while POCT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index. SFLR is actively managed, while POCT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SFLR returned 14.80%/yr vs 11.57%/yr for POCT. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for POCT.

Performance

SFLR vs. POCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFLR achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly lower than POCT's 4.83% return.

SFLR

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 3.43%
• 6M: 3.07%
• 1Y: 15.38%
• 3Y*: 14.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

POCT

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 4.83%
• 6M: 4.49%
• 1Y: 13.26%
• 3Y*: 11.57%
• 5Y*: 9.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFLR vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF	3.43%	13.29%	19.99%	21.20%	0.42%
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October	4.83%	11.00%	9.54%	20.12%	1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between SFLR and POCT is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2022	0.85

The correlation between SFLR and POCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SFLR vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFLR

SFLR Risk / Return Rank: 49
SFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 54

POCT

POCT Risk / Return Rank: 74
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFLR vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SFLR	POCT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	2.16	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	3.08	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.43	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	3.03	-0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.91	15.34	-6.43

SFLR vs. POCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the POCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFLR and POCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SFLR vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFLR drawdown since its inception was -12.13%, smaller than the maximum POCT drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLR and POCT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SFLR	POCT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.13%	-18.80%	+6.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.79%	-4.40%	-2.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.13%	-10.22%	-1.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.61%	-0.90%	-1.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-1.49%	-0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	0.87%	+0.86%

Volatility

SFLR vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) at 1.80%. This indicates that SFLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SFLR	POCT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	1.80%	+2.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.51%	4.96%	+2.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.72%	6.19%	+3.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.32%	7.97%	+2.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.32%	10.21%	+0.11%

SFLR vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than POCT's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

SFLR vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison

SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while POCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.21%
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF	0.33%	0.33%	0.42%	1.16%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SFLR and POCT in my portfolio?

SFLR and POCT have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SFLR or POCT?

SFLR has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to POCT (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFLR dropped -12.13% vs POCT's -18.80%.

Which ETF is better, SFLR or POCT?

On 3-year performance, SFLR leads with 14.80% vs 11.57% for POCT. On fees, POCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, POCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SFLR or POCT?

Over the 3-year period, SFLR has performed better with a 14.80% return vs 11.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SFLR or POCT?

POCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SFLR or POCT?

SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for POCT.

What is the main difference between SFLR and POCT?

SFLR is categorized as Options Trading, while POCT is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for SFLR and 0.79% for POCT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

POCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.