SFLR vs. DMAR
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR).
SFLR and DMAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SFLR is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Nov 8, 2022. DMAR is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Mar 18, 2021.
Performance
SFLR vs. DMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SFLR vs. DMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | -3.85% | 13.29% | 19.99% | 21.20% | 1.38% |
DMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March | 1.79% | 9.13% | 12.74% | 12.25% | 0.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFLR achieves a -3.85% return, which is significantly lower than DMAR's 1.79% return.
SFLR
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- YTD
- -3.85%
- 6M
- -1.57%
- 1Y
- 13.21%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMAR
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 12.53%
- 3Y*
- 11.15%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SFLR vs. DMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SFLR vs. DMAR — Risk / Return Rank
SFLR
DMAR
SFLR vs. DMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SFLR | DMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 1.66 | -0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 2.45 | -0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.51 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 2.08 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.91 | 13.69 | -5.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFLR | DMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 1.66 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.47 | 1.03 | +0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between SFLR and DMAR is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SFLR vs. DMAR - Dividend Comparison
SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while DMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 0.35% | 0.33% | 0.42% | 1.16% | 0.06% |
DMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SFLR vs. DMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFLR drawdown since its inception was -12.13%, which is greater than DMAR's maximum drawdown of -9.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLR and DMAR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFLR | DMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.13% | -9.84% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.79% | -6.15% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.24% | -0.14% | -5.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -1.91% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 0.93% | +0.78% |
Volatility
SFLR vs. DMAR - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) at 1.94%. This indicates that SFLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SFLR | DMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 1.94% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.42% | 2.71% | +4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.83% | 7.59% | +3.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.30% | 7.06% | +3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.30% | 7.05% | +3.25% |