PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFLNX vs. TILVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFLNX vs. TILVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SFLNX having a 14.66% return and TILVX slightly lower at 14.30%. Over the past 10 years, SFLNX has outperformed TILVX with an annualized return of 14.26%, while TILVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.10% annualized return.


SFLNX

1D
0.46%
1M
4.08%
YTD
14.66%
6M
14.73%
1Y
32.46%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
14.26%

TILVX

1D
0.79%
1M
4.27%
YTD
14.30%
6M
14.82%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
11.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFLNX vs. TILVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
14.66%17.02%16.78%18.16%-6.89%31.64%9.12%28.91%-7.43%17.08%
TILVX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund
14.30%15.81%14.26%11.49%-7.57%25.05%2.90%26.48%-8.38%10.93%

Correlation

The correlation between SFLNX and TILVX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.98

The correlation between SFLNX and TILVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFLNX vs. TILVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFLNX
SFLNX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SFLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

TILVX
TILVX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TILVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
TILVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFLNX vs. TILVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFLNXTILVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.49

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.47

4.30

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.47

18.01

+3.46

SFLNX vs. TILVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFLNX Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is comparable to the TILVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFLNX and TILVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFLNXTILVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23

2.70

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.71

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.63

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.48

+0.06

Drawdowns

SFLNX vs. TILVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFLNX drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, smaller than the maximum TILVX drawdown of -60.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLNX and TILVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFLNXTILVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.18%

-60.05%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.10%

-6.80%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-15.58%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.98%

-19.00%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.59%

-40.15%

+2.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-8.26%

+2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.62%

-0.07%

Volatility

SFLNX vs. TILVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) is 2.48%, while TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that SFLNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TILVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFLNXTILVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

3.04%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.43%

8.19%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.35%

10.84%

-0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.26%

14.82%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.40%

17.66%

+0.74%

SFLNX vs. TILVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFLNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TILVX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SFLNX vs. TILVX - Dividend Comparison

SFLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than TILVX's 5.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
1.46%1.68%1.78%1.86%2.09%4.78%6.17%5.33%9.69%3.28%7.23%5.68%
TILVX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund
5.21%5.96%3.04%4.90%4.57%3.77%2.26%7.05%4.68%2.01%3.14%4.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SFLNX and TILVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TILVX has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to SFLNX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFLNX dropped -56.18% vs TILVX's -60.05%.

SFLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFLNX and TILVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer