PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFLNX vs. SWCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFLNX vs. SWCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) and Schwab California Tax-Free Bond Fund™ (SWCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFLNX achieves a 14.66% return, which is significantly higher than SWCAX's 0.94% return. Over the past 10 years, SFLNX has outperformed SWCAX with an annualized return of 14.26%, while SWCAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.52% annualized return.


SFLNX

1D
0.46%
1M
4.08%
YTD
14.66%
6M
14.73%
1Y
32.46%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
14.26%

SWCAX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.94%
6M
1.31%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
3.22%
5Y*
0.54%
10Y*
1.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFLNX vs. SWCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
14.66%17.02%16.78%18.16%-6.89%31.64%9.12%28.91%-7.43%17.08%
SWCAX
Schwab California Tax-Free Bond Fund™
0.94%3.95%1.51%4.73%-8.10%0.36%3.93%6.02%1.16%4.37%

Correlation

The correlation between SFLNX and SWCAX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

-0.12

The correlation between SFLNX and SWCAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFLNX vs. SWCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFLNX
SFLNX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SFLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

SWCAX
SWCAX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SWCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SWCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFLNX vs. SWCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) and Schwab California Tax-Free Bond Fund™ (SWCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFLNXSWCAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.23

2.69

+0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.50

4.26

+0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.71

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.47

2.25

+3.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.47

6.90

+14.57

SFLNX vs. SWCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFLNX Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is comparable to the SWCAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFLNX and SWCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFLNXSWCAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23

2.69

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.17

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.45

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

1.18

-0.65

Drawdowns

SFLNX vs. SWCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFLNX drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, which is greater than SWCAX's maximum drawdown of -13.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLNX and SWCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFLNXSWCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.18%

-13.51%

-42.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.10%

-2.75%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-4.36%

-11.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.98%

-12.30%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.59%

-12.30%

-25.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.01%

+1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-1.87%

-4.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

0.89%

+0.66%

Volatility

SFLNX vs. SWCAX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) has a higher volatility of 2.48% compared to Schwab California Tax-Free Bond Fund™ (SWCAX) at 0.92%. This indicates that SFLNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFLNXSWCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

0.92%

+1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.43%

1.81%

+5.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.35%

2.31%

+8.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.26%

3.11%

+12.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.40%

3.37%

+15.03%

SFLNX vs. SWCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFLNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SWCAX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFLNX vs. SWCAX - Dividend Comparison

SFLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than SWCAX's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
1.46%1.68%1.78%1.86%2.09%4.78%6.17%5.33%9.69%3.28%7.23%5.68%
SWCAX
Schwab California Tax-Free Bond Fund™
3.19%3.46%2.67%2.23%1.57%1.68%2.45%2.54%2.50%2.22%3.10%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFLNX and SWCAX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFLNX has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to SWCAX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFLNX dropped -56.18% vs SWCAX's -13.51%.

SFLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFLNX and SWCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer