SFLNX vs. LSVVX
SFLNX (Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund) and LSVVX (LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SFLNX returned 14.18%/yr vs 11.12%/yr for LSVVX. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. SFLNX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for LSVVX.
Performance
SFLNX vs. LSVVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFLNX achieves a 17.37% return, which is significantly lower than LSVVX's 20.59% return. Over the past 10 years, SFLNX has outperformed LSVVX with an annualized return of 14.18%, while LSVVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.12% annualized return.
SFLNX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- YTD
- 17.37%
- 1Y
- 32.13%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- 13.76%
- 10Y*
- 14.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.25%
LSVVX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- YTD
- 20.59%
- 1Y
- 39.09%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
SFLNX vs. LSVVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund | 17.37% | 17.02% | 16.78% | 18.16% | -6.89% | 31.64% | 9.12% | 28.91% | -7.43% | 17.08% |
LSVVX LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund | 20.59% | 19.63% | 3.97% | 12.19% | -4.02% | 28.57% | -3.46% | 25.29% | -11.10% | 16.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFLNX and LSVVX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | 0.97 |
The correlation between SFLNX and LSVVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFLNX vs. LSVVX — Risk / Return Rank
SFLNX
LSVVX
SFLNX vs. LSVVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) and LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFLNX | LSVVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.59 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.87 | 5.83 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.48 | 23.09 | -3.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFLNX vs. LSVVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFLNX drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, smaller than the maximum LSVVX drawdown of -61.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLNX and LSVVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFLNX | LSVVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.18% | -61.62% | +5.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.10% | -6.23% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.27% | -24.61% | +8.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.98% | -24.61% | +5.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.59% | -40.61% | +3.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -0.76% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.96% | -12.10% | +6.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 1.58% | -0.05% |
Volatility
SFLNX vs. LSVVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) is 2.33%, while LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX) has a volatility of 2.68%. This indicates that SFLNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSVVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFLNX | LSVVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.33% | 2.68% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.49% | 8.14% | -0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.50% | 11.22% | -0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 15.84% | -0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 18.42% | -0.08% |
SFLNX vs. LSVVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFLNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LSVVX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFLNX vs. LSVVX - Dividend Comparison
SFLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than LSVVX's 11.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSVVX LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund | 11.35% | 13.69% | 2.45% | 6.57% | 5.41% | 3.67% | 2.40% | 21.48% | 3.91% | 1.98% | 2.37% | 2.38% |
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund | 1.43% | 1.68% | 1.78% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 4.78% | 6.17% | 5.33% | 9.69% | 3.28% | 7.23% | 5.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SFLNX and LSVVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LSVVX has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to SFLNX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFLNX dropped -56.18% vs LSVVX's -61.62%.
LSVVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFLNX and LSVVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer