PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFITX vs. GUSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFITX vs. GUSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Farm Interim Fund (SFITX) and GMO U.S. Treasury Fund (GUSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFITX achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than GUSTX's 1.26% return. Over the past 10 years, SFITX has outperformed GUSTX with an annualized return of 1.28%, while GUSTX has yielded a comparatively lower -13.75% annualized return.


SFITX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.21%
YTD
-0.22%
6M
0.30%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
3.49%
5Y*
0.90%
10Y*
1.28%

GUSTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.14%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.59%
1Y
3.69%
3Y*
3.32%
5Y*
1.91%
10Y*
-13.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFITX vs. GUSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SFITX
State Farm Interim Fund
-0.22%5.41%2.54%3.73%-5.88%-1.60%4.89%4.26%1.04%0.61%
GUSTX
GMO U.S. Treasury Fund
1.26%4.45%2.21%2.52%-0.73%-0.06%0.89%0.14%-79.59%0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SFITX and GUSTX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

0.12

Over the past year, SFITX and GUSTX have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFITX vs. GUSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFITX
SFITX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SFITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFITX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SFITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFITX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

GUSTX
GUSTX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
GUSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFITX vs. GUSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Farm Interim Fund (SFITX) and GMO U.S. Treasury Fund (GUSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SFITXGUSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

5.56

-4.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

19.28

-17.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.02

53.96

-48.94

SFITX vs. GUSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFITX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the GUSTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFITX and GUSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SFITX vs. GUSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFITX drawdown since its inception was -9.13%, smaller than the maximum GUSTX drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFITX and GUSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFITXGUSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.13%

-79.98%

+70.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.53%

-0.20%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.80%

-1.19%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.78%

-1.19%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.13%

-79.98%

+70.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-77.72%

+76.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-36.16%

+35.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

0.07%

+0.48%

Volatility

SFITX vs. GUSTX - Volatility Comparison

State Farm Interim Fund (SFITX) has a higher volatility of 0.73% compared to GMO U.S. Treasury Fund (GUSTX) at 0.49%. This indicates that SFITX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFITXGUSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

0.49%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.68%

0.89%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32%

1.24%

+1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.05%

1.76%

+1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.49%

25.46%

-22.97%

SFITX vs. GUSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFITX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than GUSTX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SFITX vs. GUSTX - Dividend Comparison

SFITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than GUSTX's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GUSTX
GMO U.S. Treasury Fund
3.83%4.15%1.98%2.28%0.26%0.14%0.09%0.14%8.96%0.50%0.05%0.04%
SFITX
State Farm Interim Fund
3.70%3.28%2.72%1.85%0.92%0.94%2.13%1.75%1.12%1.12%0.79%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFITX and GUSTX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFITX has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to GUSTX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFITX dropped -9.13% vs GUSTX's -79.98%.

GUSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFITX and GUSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer