PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUSTX vs. PRXCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUSTX vs. PRXCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO U.S. Treasury Fund (GUSTX) and T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund (PRXCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSTX achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than PRXCX's 2.04% return. Over the past 10 years, GUSTX has underperformed PRXCX with an annualized return of -13.74%, while PRXCX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.35% annualized return.


GUSTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.79%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
3.18%
5Y*
1.95%
10Y*
-13.74%

PRXCX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.88%
YTD
2.04%
6M
2.59%
1Y
9.18%
3Y*
4.80%
5Y*
1.48%
10Y*
2.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUSTX vs. PRXCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GUSTX
GMO U.S. Treasury Fund
1.46%4.45%2.21%2.52%-0.73%-0.06%0.89%0.14%-79.59%0.43%
PRXCX
T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund
2.04%3.99%3.62%7.64%-9.93%2.68%4.39%7.31%0.75%5.54%

Correlation

The correlation between GUSTX and PRXCX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.09

The correlation between GUSTX and PRXCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUSTX vs. PRXCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUSTX
GUSTX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
GUSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

PRXCX
PRXCX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PRXCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRXCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRXCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PRXCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRXCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUSTX vs. PRXCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO U.S. Treasury Fund (GUSTX) and T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund (PRXCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GUSTXPRXCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.34

2.76

+0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

11.33

4.48

+6.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

7.41

1.71

+5.71

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

21.48

2.90

+18.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

62.37

10.77

+51.60

GUSTX vs. PRXCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUSTX Sharpe Ratio is 3.34, which is comparable to the PRXCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUSTX and PRXCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GUSTXPRXCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34

2.76

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

0.34

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.54

0.57

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

1.09

-1.53

Drawdowns

GUSTX vs. PRXCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSTX drawdown since its inception was -79.98%, which is greater than PRXCX's maximum drawdown of -21.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSTX and PRXCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUSTXPRXCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.98%

-21.67%

-58.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.20%

-3.02%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.19%

-6.68%

+5.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.19%

-15.41%

+14.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.98%

-15.41%

-64.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.68%

-0.09%

-77.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.03%

-2.78%

-33.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

0.81%

-0.74%

Volatility

GUSTX vs. PRXCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO U.S. Treasury Fund (GUSTX) is 0.34%, while T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund (PRXCX) has a volatility of 1.34%. This indicates that GUSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRXCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUSTXPRXCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

1.34%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.87%

2.40%

-1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22%

3.23%

-2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.75%

4.41%

-2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.45%

4.14%

+21.31%

GUSTX vs. PRXCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSTX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than PRXCX's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUSTX vs. PRXCX - Dividend Comparison

GUSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than PRXCX's 4.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GUSTX
GMO U.S. Treasury Fund
3.82%4.15%1.98%2.28%0.26%0.14%0.09%0.14%8.96%0.50%0.05%0.04%
PRXCX
T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund
4.92%4.58%4.10%3.50%2.21%2.82%2.80%2.94%3.11%3.09%3.33%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


GUSTX and PRXCX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRXCX has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to GUSTX (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSTX dropped -79.98% vs PRXCX's -21.67%.

GUSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 2.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUSTX and PRXCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer