PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFEB vs. JANB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFEB vs. JANB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - February (SFEB) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFEB achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than JANB's 5.32% return.


SFEB

1D
-0.52%
1M
1.52%
YTD
10.55%
6M
9.53%
1Y
23.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JANB

1D
-0.50%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
5.32%
6M
5.27%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFEB vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SFEB and JANB is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025

0.79

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFEB vs. JANB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFEB
SFEB Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

JANB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFEB vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - February (SFEB) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SFEBJANBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.15

SFEB vs. JANB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SFEB vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFEB drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, which is greater than JANB's maximum drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFEB and JANB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFEBJANBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

-6.52%

-10.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.97%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-1.10%

-1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

Volatility

SFEB vs. JANB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFEBJANBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.56%

7.51%

+2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.02%

7.51%

+4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.02%

7.51%

+4.51%

SFEB vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFEB has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFEB vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison

Neither SFEB nor JANB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SFEB and JANB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SFEB.

SFEB and JANB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SFEB and 0.25% for JANB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFEB and JANB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer