PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFEB vs. IGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFEB vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - February (SFEB) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFEB achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly higher than IGLD's -6.56% return.


SFEB

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.15%
6M
8.03%
YTD
11.22%
1Y
22.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.35%

IGLD

1D
-1.09%
1M
-1.14%
6M
-15.05%
YTD
-6.56%
1Y
13.80%
3Y*
19.55%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.80M$5.50M$7.14M
$158.86K$157.36K$135.84K

SFEB vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SFEB and IGLD is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2024

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFEB vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SFEB
SFEB Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLD
IGLD Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SFEB vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - February (SFEB) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SFEBIGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.13

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

0.65

+3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.22

1.46

+15.76

SFEB vs. IGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFEB Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the IGLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFEB and IGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SFEB vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFEB drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, smaller than the maximum IGLD drawdown of -23.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFEB and IGLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFEBIGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

-23.84%

+7.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.22%

-23.84%

+18.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-22.04%

+21.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-5.70%

+3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

10.55%

-9.31%

Volatility

SFEB vs. IGLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - February (SFEB) is 1.62%, while FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that SFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFEBIGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

5.69%

-4.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.73%

22.06%

-15.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.30%

25.10%

-15.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.80%

15.74%

-3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.80%

15.43%

-3.63%

SFEB vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFEB has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFEB vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison

SFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
20.71%9.91%20.81%7.85%4.45%2.24%
SFEB
FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - February
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFEB and IGLD have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGLD has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to SFEB (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFEB dropped -16.67% vs IGLD's -23.84%.

On 1-year performance, SFEB leads with 22.47% vs 13.80% for IGLD. On fees, IGLD is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, SFEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SFEB has performed better with a 22.47% return vs 13.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGLD is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SFEB.

IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 20.71%, compared with 0.00% for SFEB.

SFEB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while IGLD is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SFEB and 0.85% for IGLD.

SFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFEB and IGLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer