SFEB vs. COMT
SFEB (FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - February) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFEB is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. SFEB is actively managed, while COMT is passively managed. Over the past year, SFEB returned 23.07% vs 25.27% for COMT. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. SFEB charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
SFEB vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFEB achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 23.88% return.
SFEB
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- 1Y
- 23.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -11.91%
- YTD
- 23.88%
- 6M
- 22.75%
- 1Y
- 25.27%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.76%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
SFEB vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SFEB FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - February | 10.55% | 9.24% | 9.37% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 23.88% | 6.07% | 3.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFEB and COMT is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2024 | -0.01 |
The correlation between SFEB and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFEB vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
SFEB
COMT
SFEB vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - February (SFEB) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFEB | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.22 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.44 | 1.63 | +2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.15 | 6.99 | +11.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFEB vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFEB drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFEB and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFEB | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.67% | -51.89% | +35.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.22% | -15.58% | +10.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -15.58% | +15.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.46% | -24.00% | +21.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.27% | 3.65% | -2.38% |
Volatility
SFEB vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - February (SFEB) is 2.60%, while iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 5.02%. This indicates that SFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFEB | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 5.02% | -2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.75% | 19.24% | -12.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.56% | 21.45% | -11.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.02% | 21.13% | -9.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.02% | 18.86% | -6.84% |
SFEB vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFEB has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFEB vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
SFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 6.25% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
SFEB FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFEB and COMT have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to SFEB (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFEB dropped -16.67% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 25.27% vs 23.07% for SFEB. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, SFEB has been the lower-risk option at 2.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 25.27% return vs 23.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SFEB.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 6.25%, compared with 0.00% for SFEB.
SFEB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SFEB and 0.48% for COMT.
SFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFEB and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer