PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFBDX vs. FSMUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SFBDX vs. FSMUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Farm Municipal Bond Fund (SFBDX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SFBDX vs. FSMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SFBDX
State Farm Municipal Bond Fund
-0.93%5.11%0.65%4.05%-6.83%0.42%
FSMUX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund
-1.13%3.14%2.99%6.78%-11.25%0.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFBDX achieves a -0.93% return, which is significantly higher than FSMUX's -1.13% return.


SFBDX

1D
0.12%
1M
-2.75%
YTD
-0.93%
6M
0.64%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
2.22%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*
1.73%

FSMUX

1D
0.11%
1M
-2.56%
YTD
-1.13%
6M
0.12%
1Y
2.39%
3Y*
2.93%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SFBDX vs. FSMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFBDX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMUX's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SFBDX vs. FSMUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFBDX
SFBDX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SFBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SFBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMUX
FSMUX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FSMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFBDX vs. FSMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Farm Municipal Bond Fund (SFBDX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFBDXFSMUXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

0.63

+0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

0.87

+0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.19

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

0.28

+0.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.74

0.78

+3.96

SFBDX vs. FSMUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFBDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the FSMUX Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFBDX and FSMUX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFBDXFSMUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

0.63

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

-0.00

+1.17

Correlation

The correlation between SFBDX and FSMUX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SFBDX vs. FSMUX - Dividend Comparison

SFBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than FSMUX's 2.35% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFBDX
State Farm Municipal Bond Fund
3.04%2.97%2.62%2.46%2.01%2.33%4.03%2.78%2.23%2.77%2.06%2.64%
FSMUX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund
2.35%3.26%3.74%3.18%2.14%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SFBDX vs. FSMUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFBDX drawdown since its inception was -11.79%, smaller than the maximum FSMUX drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFBDX and FSMUX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SFBDXFSMUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.79%

-16.27%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.58%

-5.30%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

-2.56%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-5.61%

+4.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

1.96%

-1.06%

Volatility

SFBDX vs. FSMUX - Volatility Comparison

State Farm Municipal Bond Fund (SFBDX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) have volatilities of 0.95% and 0.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SFBDXFSMUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

0.99%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.54%

2.12%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

6.65%

-2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.23%

4.67%

-1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.39%

4.67%

-1.28%