PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFAAX vs. SIFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFAAX vs. SIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Index Asset Allocation Fund (SFAAX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFAAX achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly lower than SIFAX's 5.68% return. Over the past 10 years, SFAAX has outperformed SIFAX with an annualized return of 9.34%, while SIFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.24% annualized return.


SFAAX

1D
-0.95%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
4.76%
6M
3.72%
1Y
14.14%
3Y*
12.86%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
9.34%

SIFAX

1D
0.24%
1M
-2.79%
YTD
5.68%
6M
5.82%
1Y
9.25%
3Y*
6.67%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*
3.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFAAX vs. SIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SFAAX
Allspring Index Asset Allocation Fund
4.76%11.39%14.61%16.64%-17.03%15.76%16.21%21.52%-2.82%12.25%
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
5.68%7.82%4.08%-1.74%8.48%10.83%-1.59%5.68%-3.64%-1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between SFAAX and SIFAX is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.25

The correlation between SFAAX and SIFAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFAAX vs. SIFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFAAX
SFAAX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SFAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SFAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SIFAX
SIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFAAX vs. SIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Index Asset Allocation Fund (SFAAX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SFAAXSIFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.28

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.04

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.90

9.03

+1.87

SFAAX vs. SIFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the SIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFAAX and SIFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SFAAX vs. SIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFAAX drawdown since its inception was -47.78%, which is greater than SIFAX's maximum drawdown of -23.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFAAX and SIFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFAAXSIFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.78%

-23.62%

-24.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.69%

-4.24%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.69%

-4.24%

-7.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.32%

-8.32%

-16.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.32%

-14.69%

-9.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-4.01%

+1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-8.53%

+2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

1.01%

+0.37%

Volatility

SFAAX vs. SIFAX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Index Asset Allocation Fund (SFAAX) has a higher volatility of 3.45% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) at 1.62%. This indicates that SFAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFAAXSIFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

1.62%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.70%

4.76%

+1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.60%

5.55%

+3.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.44%

5.62%

+5.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.42%

5.23%

+6.19%

SFAAX vs. SIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFAAX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SIFAX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFAAX vs. SIFAX - Dividend Comparison

SFAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.84%, more than SIFAX's 4.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFAAX
Allspring Index Asset Allocation Fund
11.84%12.65%12.74%7.46%4.98%5.92%3.77%3.60%3.88%1.27%1.66%6.34%
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
4.31%4.55%3.25%3.82%11.90%7.89%1.45%1.49%1.90%1.39%1.15%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFAAX and SIFAX have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFAAX has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to SIFAX (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFAAX dropped -47.78% vs SIFAX's -23.62%.

SFAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFAAX and SIFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer