PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEUC.L vs. IGBE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEUC.L vs. IGBE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SEUC.L) and Invesco GBP Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF Dist (IGBE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SEUC.L is traded in EUR, while IGBE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IGBE.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEUC.L achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than IGBE.L's 0.69% return.


SEUC.L

1D
0.05%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.55%
6M
0.70%
1Y
1.91%
3Y*
3.72%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
0.86%

IGBE.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.60%
YTD
0.69%
6M
1.20%
1Y
2.05%
3Y*
6.17%
5Y*
-0.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEUC.L vs. IGBE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SEUC.L
SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.55%3.03%4.21%4.17%-3.54%-0.27%0.27%
IGBE.L
Invesco GBP Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF Dist
0.69%1.64%7.39%11.47%-22.45%2.65%0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SEUC.L and IGBE.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2020

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEUC.L vs. IGBE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEUC.L
SEUC.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SEUC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEUC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEUC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SEUC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEUC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

IGBE.L
IGBE.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
IGBE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGBE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGBE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IGBE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGBE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEUC.L vs. IGBE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SEUC.L) and Invesco GBP Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF Dist (IGBE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEUC.LIGBE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.06

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

0.56

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.27

1.42

+7.85

SEUC.L vs. IGBE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEUC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the IGBE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEUC.L and IGBE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEUC.LIGBE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

0.31

+1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.18

-0.05

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

-0.03

+0.50

Drawdowns

SEUC.L vs. IGBE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEUC.L drawdown since its inception was -7.82%, smaller than the maximum IGBE.L drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEUC.L and IGBE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEUC.LIGBE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-32.28%

+24.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.83%

-3.65%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.83%

-7.81%

+6.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.90%

-32.28%

+27.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-6.47%

+6.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.65%

-10.58%

+9.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

1.44%

-1.23%

Volatility

SEUC.L vs. IGBE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SEUC.L) is 0.36%, while Invesco GBP Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF Dist (IGBE.L) has a volatility of 2.20%. This indicates that SEUC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGBE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEUC.LIGBE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

2.20%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.95%

5.08%

-4.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08%

6.68%

-5.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.35%

9.50%

-8.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.15%

10.35%

-8.20%

SEUC.L vs. IGBE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEUC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IGBE.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SEUC.L vs. IGBE.L - Dividend Comparison

SEUC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than IGBE.L's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGBE.L
Invesco GBP Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF Dist
4.93%4.81%4.59%3.85%2.47%1.76%1.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEUC.L
SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
2.96%3.05%2.59%1.27%0.19%0.30%0.23%0.17%0.11%0.28%0.50%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEUC.L and IGBE.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IGBE.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGBE.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SEUC.L.

SEUC.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Corp 1-3 Yr TR EUR, while IGBE.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SEUC.L and 0.10% for IGBE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEUC.L and IGBE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer