SETM vs. MGNR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) and American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR).

SETM and MGNR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SETM is a passively managed fund by Sprott that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Select Index - AUD - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Feb 1, 2023. MGNR is an actively managed fund by American Beacon. It was launched on Feb 5, 2024.

Performance

SETM vs. MGNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) and American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SETM vs. MGNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SETM Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF	17.03%	95.27%	-5.40%
MGNR American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF	17.82%	50.57%	22.78%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SETM having a 17.03% return and MGNR slightly higher at 17.82%.

SETM

• 1D: 2.42%
• 1M: -13.63%
• YTD: 17.03%
• 6M: 36.39%
• 1Y: 143.13%
• 3Y*: 27.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MGNR

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: -4.73%
• YTD: 17.82%
• 6M: 27.81%
• 1Y: 75.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SETM vs. MGNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SETM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than MGNR's 0.75% expense ratio.

MGNR

American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF

SETM

Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF

Return for Risk

SETM vs. MGNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SETM

SETM Risk / Return Rank: 96
SETM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
SETM Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
SETM Omega Ratio Rank: 94
SETM Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
SETM Martin Ratio Rank: 97

MGNR

MGNR Risk / Return Rank: 96
MGNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
MGNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
MGNR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MGNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
MGNR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SETM vs. MGNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) and American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SETM	MGNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.14	2.75	+0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	3.21	+0.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.49	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.56	4.80	+0.76
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.61	21.49	-2.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SETM vs. MGNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SETM Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is comparable to the MGNR Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SETM and MGNR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SETM	MGNR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.14	2.75	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	1.73	-1.18

Correlation

The correlation between SETM and MGNR is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SETM vs. MGNR - Dividend Comparison

SETM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than MGNR's 0.99% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
SETM Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF	1.34%	1.56%	2.07%	2.47%
MGNR American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF	0.99%	1.17%	0.79%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SETM vs. MGNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SETM drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than MGNR's maximum drawdown of -22.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETM and MGNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SETM	MGNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.81%	-22.06%	-20.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.85%	-16.06%	-9.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.72%	-4.73%	-9.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.59%	-4.01%	-10.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.72%	3.58%	+4.14%

Volatility

SETM vs. MGNR - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) has a higher volatility of 16.58% compared to American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) at 8.76%. This indicates that SETM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SETM	MGNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.58%	8.76%	+7.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.76%	19.87%	+16.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.86%	27.73%	+18.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.22%	25.39%	+10.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.22%	25.39%	+10.83%