PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SETH vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SETH vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SETH having a 29.49% return and TQQQ slightly lower at 29.42%.


SETH

1D
-0.18%
1M
-10.05%
6M
5.54%
YTD
29.49%
1Y
27.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-31.12%

TQQQ

1D
5.17%
1M
-7.35%
6M
23.83%
YTD
29.42%
1Y
64.98%
3Y*
50.64%
5Y*
16.02%
10Y*
39.51%
ALL TIME*
42.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.09M$1.16M$1.85M
$4.46B$4.47B$5.36B

SETH vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SETH
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF
29.49%-29.41%-49.59%-22.19%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
29.42%34.35%58.27%47.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SETH and TQQQ is -0.50, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2023

-0.44

The correlation between SETH and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.50 to -0.44 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SETH vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SETH
SETH Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SETH Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
SETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SETH Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SETH vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SETHTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.21

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

1.77

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.60

4.90

-3.30

SETH vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SETH Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SETH and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SETH vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SETH drawdown since its inception was -80.74%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETH and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SETHTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.74%

-81.66%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.71%

-36.97%

+7.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.43%

-21.90%

-42.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.12%

-18.50%

-36.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.71%

13.31%

+4.40%

Volatility

SETH vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) is 12.55%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 20.63%. This indicates that SETH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SETHTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.55%

20.63%

-8.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.56%

47.88%

-2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.05%

57.57%

+9.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.84%

68.10%

+0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.84%

66.61%

+2.23%

SETH vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SETH and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

SETH vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.11%, more than TQQQ's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SETH
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF
22.11%7.01%3.44%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.56%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


SETH and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (20.63%) compared to SETH (12.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SETH dropped -80.74% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 1-year performance, TQQQ leads with 64.98% vs 27.48% for SETH. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SETH has been the lower-risk option at 12.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 64.98% return vs 27.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SETH and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

SETH has the higher dividend yield at 22.11%, compared with 0.56% for TQQQ.

SETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SETH tracks Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SETH and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer