SETH vs. SOEZ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) and SOEZ (Franklin Solana ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. SETH is passively managed, while SOEZ is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.89, they often move in opposite directions. SETH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOEZ.

Performance

SETH vs. SOEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SETH achieves a 29.34% return, which is significantly higher than SOEZ's -37.14% return.

SETH

• 1D: 2.35%
• 1M: -6.08%
• 6M: 44.18%
• YTD: 29.34%
• 1Y: 22.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SOEZ

• 1D: -1.74%
• 1M: 3.32%
• 6M: -44.84%
• YTD: -37.14%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SETH vs. SOEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	29.34%	-1.45%
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	-37.14%	-11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SETH and SOEZ is -0.89, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025	-0.89

Return for Risk

SETH vs. SOEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SETH

SETH Risk / Return Rank: 18
SETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
SETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
SETH Omega Ratio Rank: 19
SETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
SETH Martin Ratio Rank: 17

SOEZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SETH vs. SOEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SETH	SOEZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.33	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.91	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.23	—	—

Drawdowns

SETH vs. SOEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SETH drawdown since its inception was -80.74%, which is greater than SOEZ's maximum drawdown of -56.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETH and SOEZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SETH	SOEZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.74%	-56.14%	-24.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.47%	-47.18%	-17.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.94%	-34.12%	-20.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.36%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SETH	SOEZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.79%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.12%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.52%	70.21%	-1.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.29%	70.21%	-0.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.29%	70.21%	-0.92%

SETH vs. SOEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOEZ's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

SETH vs. SOEZ - Dividend Comparison

SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.26%, more than SOEZ's 0.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	17.26%	7.01%	3.44%	0.38%
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SETH and SOEZ in my portfolio?

SETH and SOEZ have a correlation of -0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SETH or SOEZ?

On fees, SOEZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SETH or SOEZ?

SOEZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SETH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SETH or SOEZ?

SETH has the higher dividend yield at 17.26%, compared with 0.87% for SOEZ.

What is the main difference between SETH and SOEZ?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SETH and 0.19% for SOEZ.