SETH vs. SBIT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from ProShares - SETH tracks the Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%) while SBIT tracks the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SETH returned 27.48% vs 93.05% for SBIT. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

SETH vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SETH achieves a 29.49% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 35.42% return.

SETH

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -10.05%
• 6M: 5.54%
• YTD: 29.49%
• 1Y: 27.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -31.12%

SBIT

• 1D: -2.88%
• 1M: -8.74%
• 6M: 12.84%
• YTD: 35.42%
• 1Y: 93.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -43.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	$30.10M	$32.07M	$46.36M
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	$1.09M	$1.16M	$1.85M

SETH vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	29.49%	-29.41%	-18.66%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	35.42%	-25.11%	-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SETH and SBIT is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	0.81

The correlation between SETH and SBIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SETH vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SETH

SETH Risk / Return Rank: 24
SETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
SETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
SETH Omega Ratio Rank: 25
SETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
SETH Martin Ratio Rank: 22

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 45
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SETH vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SETH	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	1.06	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	1.78	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.21	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.93	1.95	-1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.60	4.30	-2.71

SETH vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SETH Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SETH and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SETH vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SETH drawdown since its inception was -80.74%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETH and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SETH	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.74%	-91.35%	+10.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.71%	-47.94%	+18.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.43%	-78.51%	+14.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.12%	-69.09%	+13.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.71%	21.71%	-4.00%

Volatility

SETH vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) is 12.55%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 17.65%. This indicates that SETH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SETH	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.55%	17.65%	-5.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.56%	67.17%	-21.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.05%	88.67%	-21.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	68.84%	96.04%	-27.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	68.84%	96.04%	-27.20%

SETH vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SETH and SBIT have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

SETH vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.11%, more than SBIT's 5.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	5.09%	0.52%	1.00%	0.00%
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	22.11%	7.01%	3.44%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SETH and SBIT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, SETH and SBIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SETH or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (17.65%) compared to SETH (12.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SETH dropped -80.74% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, SETH or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 93.05% vs 27.48% for SETH. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SETH has been the lower-risk option at 12.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SETH or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 93.05% return vs 27.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SETH or SBIT?

SETH and SBIT have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SETH or SBIT?

SETH has the higher dividend yield at 22.11%, compared with 5.09% for SBIT.

What is the main difference between SETH and SBIT?

SETH tracks Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%), while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.