PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SETH vs. BITS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SETH vs. BITS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) and Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SETH achieves a 37.43% return, which is significantly higher than BITS's -11.26% return.


SETH

1D
1.22%
1M
-8.19%
6M
43.90%
YTD
37.43%
1Y
14.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITS

1D
-3.52%
1M
-10.81%
6M
-21.88%
YTD
-11.26%
1Y
-15.13%
3Y*
28.57%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SETH vs. BITS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SETH
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF
37.43%-29.41%-49.59%-22.19%
BITS
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-11.26%14.90%61.84%54.79%

Correlation

The correlation between SETH and BITS is -0.78, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2023

-0.75

The correlation between SETH and BITS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.78 to -0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SETH vs. BITS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SETH
SETH Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SETH Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SETH Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

BITS
BITS Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BITS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITS Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
BITS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITS Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SETH vs. BITS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) and Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SETHBITSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.99

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

-0.31

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.62

-0.54

+1.15

SETH vs. BITS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SETH Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the BITS Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SETH and BITS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SETH vs. BITS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SETH drawdown since its inception was -80.74%, roughly equal to the maximum BITS drawdown of -83.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETH and BITS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SETHBITSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.74%

-83.11%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.92%

-48.38%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.25%

-41.58%

-20.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.90%

-42.59%

-12.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.13%

28.29%

-5.16%

Volatility

SETH vs. BITS - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) has a higher volatility of 16.64% compared to Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) at 12.34%. This indicates that SETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SETHBITSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.64%

12.34%

+4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.74%

40.40%

+6.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.32%

53.28%

+15.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.32%

60.68%

+8.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.32%

60.68%

+8.64%

SETH vs. BITS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BITS's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

SETH vs. BITS - Dividend Comparison

SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.24%, less than BITS's 25.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BITS
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF
25.64%22.80%29.49%13.69%0.48%1.90%
SETH
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF
16.24%7.01%3.44%0.38%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SETH and BITS have a correlation of -0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SETH has higher volatility (16.64%) compared to BITS (12.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SETH dropped -80.74% vs BITS's -83.11%.

On 1-year performance, SETH leads with 14.25% vs -15.13% for BITS. On fees, BITS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BITS has been the lower-risk option at 12.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SETH has performed better with a 14.25% return vs -15.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SETH.

BITS has the higher dividend yield at 25.64%, compared with 16.24% for SETH.

SETH tracks Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%), while BITS tracks NONE. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SETH and 0.65% for BITS.

SETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SETH and BITS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer