SETH vs. EETH
SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) and EETH (ProShares Ether Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from ProShares. SETH is passively managed, while EETH is actively managed. Over the past year, SETH returned -1.33% vs -34.99% for EETH. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SETH vs. EETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SETH achieves a 40.93% return, which is significantly higher than EETH's -40.33% return.
SETH
- 1D
- 5.62%
- 1M
- 29.74%
- YTD
- 40.93%
- 6M
- 46.51%
- 1Y
- -1.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EETH
- 1D
- -5.60%
- 1M
- -23.79%
- YTD
- -40.33%
- 6M
- -43.77%
- 1Y
- -34.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SETH vs. EETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 40.93% | -29.41% | -49.59% | -22.80% |
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF | -40.33% | -17.19% | 33.29% | 24.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between SETH and EETH is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023 | -1.00 |
The correlation between SETH and EETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SETH vs. EETH — Risk / Return Rank
SETH
EETH
SETH vs. EETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) and ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SETH | EETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.95 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | -0.55 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | -0.90 | +0.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SETH | EETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 | -0.51 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.45 | -0.06 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
SETH vs. EETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SETH drawdown since its inception was -80.74%, which is greater than EETH's maximum drawdown of -66.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETH and EETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SETH | EETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.74% | -66.86% | -13.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.01% | -64.18% | +8.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.29% | -64.18% | +2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.79% | -29.45% | -25.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.77% | 38.76% | -2.99% |
Volatility
SETH vs. EETH - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) and ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) have volatilities of 9.81% and 9.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SETH | EETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.81% | 9.92% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.07% | 46.21% | -0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.54% | 68.81% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.53% | 68.93% | +0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.53% | 68.93% | +0.60% |
SETH vs. EETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SETH and EETH have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SETH vs. EETH - Dividend Comparison
SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.91%, less than EETH's 89.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF | 89.04% | 56.98% | 10.82% | 0.52% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 10.91% | 7.01% | 3.44% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SETH and EETH have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EETH has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to SETH (9.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SETH dropped -80.74% vs EETH's -66.86%.
On 1-year performance, SETH leads with -1.33% vs -34.99% for EETH. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SETH has been the lower-risk option at 9.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SETH has performed better with a -1.33% return vs -34.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SETH and EETH have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
EETH has the higher dividend yield at 89.04%, compared with 10.91% for SETH.
SETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SETH and EETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer