SETH vs. CEPI
SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) and CEPI (REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. SETH is passively managed, while CEPI is actively managed. Over the past year, SETH returned -1.33% vs 34.07% for CEPI. At a correlation of -0.66, they often move in opposite directions. SETH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for CEPI.
Performance
SETH vs. CEPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SETH achieves a 40.93% return, which is significantly higher than CEPI's 20.71% return.
SETH
- 1D
- 5.62%
- 1M
- 29.74%
- YTD
- 40.93%
- 6M
- 46.51%
- 1Y
- -1.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEPI
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 18.40%
- 1Y
- 34.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SETH vs. CEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 40.93% | -29.41% | 14.40% |
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF | 20.71% | 10.75% | -9.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SETH and CEPI is -0.65, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024 | -0.66 |
The correlation between SETH and CEPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.66 to -0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SETH vs. CEPI — Risk / Return Rank
SETH
CEPI
SETH vs. CEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) and REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SETH | CEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.24 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 1.52 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | 3.62 | -3.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SETH | CEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 | 1.28 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.45 | 0.45 | -0.89 |
Drawdowns
SETH vs. CEPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SETH drawdown since its inception was -80.74%, which is greater than CEPI's maximum drawdown of -29.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETH and CEPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SETH | CEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.74% | -29.48% | -51.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.01% | -22.47% | -33.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.29% | -2.08% | -59.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.79% | -8.65% | -46.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.77% | 9.43% | +26.34% |
Volatility
SETH vs. CEPI - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) at 5.92%. This indicates that SETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SETH | CEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.81% | 5.92% | +3.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.07% | 20.94% | +25.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.54% | 26.79% | +41.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.53% | 31.57% | +37.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.53% | 31.57% | +37.96% |
SETH vs. CEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CEPI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
SETH vs. CEPI - Dividend Comparison
SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.91%, less than CEPI's 42.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF | 42.71% | 50.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 10.91% | 7.01% | 3.44% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SETH and CEPI have a correlation of -0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SETH has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to CEPI (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SETH dropped -80.74% vs CEPI's -29.48%.
On 1-year performance, CEPI leads with 34.07% vs -1.33% for SETH. On fees, CEPI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, CEPI has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CEPI has performed better with a 34.07% return vs -1.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CEPI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SETH.
CEPI has the higher dividend yield at 42.71%, compared with 10.91% for SETH.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SETH and 0.85% for CEPI.
CEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SETH and CEPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer