SETH vs. CBTO
SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) and CBTO (Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - SETH is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%), while CBTO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. SETH is passively managed, while CBTO is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.84, they often move in opposite directions. SETH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBTO.
Performance
SETH vs. CBTO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SETH achieves a 48.48% return, which is significantly higher than CBTO's -8.41% return.
SETH
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 19.90%
- YTD
- 48.48%
- 6M
- 48.59%
- 1Y
- -6.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBTO
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- -8.41%
- 6M
- -9.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SETH vs. CBTO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 48.48% | 42.59% |
CBTO Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -8.41% | -13.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SETH and CBTO is -0.84, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | -0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SETH vs. CBTO — Risk / Return Rank
SETH
CBTO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SETH vs. CBTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SETH | CBTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.21 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SETH vs. CBTO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SETH drawdown since its inception was -80.74%, which is greater than CBTO's maximum drawdown of -21.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETH and CBTO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SETH | CBTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.74% | -21.23% | -59.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.21% | -21.23% | -37.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.80% | -15.30% | -39.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.80% | — | — |
Volatility
SETH vs. CBTO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SETH | CBTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.71% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.21% | 12.38% | +56.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.66% | 12.38% | +57.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.66% | 12.38% | +57.28% |
SETH vs. CBTO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CBTO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SETH vs. CBTO - Dividend Comparison
SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.36%, more than CBTO's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBTO Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.24% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 10.36% | 7.01% | 3.44% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SETH and CBTO have a correlation of -0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBTO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBTO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SETH.
SETH has the higher dividend yield at 10.36%, compared with 0.24% for CBTO.
SETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBTO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SETH and 0.69% for CBTO.
Find the right allocation for SETH and CBTO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer