SES vs. QVCGA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SES (SES AI Corp) and QVCGA (QVC Group Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — SES in Auto Parts, QVCGA in Internet Retail.

Performance

SES vs. QVCGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SES AI Corp (SES) and QVC Group Inc (QVCGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SES

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -5.31%
• YTD: -40.56%
• 6M: -47.55%
• 1Y: 11.83%
• 3Y*: -20.00%
• 5Y*: -36.15%
• 10Y*: —

QVCGA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SES vs. QVCGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SES SES AI Corp	-15.75%
QVCGA QVC Group Inc	0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SES : $356.14M QVCGA : $2.75M
EPS SES : -$0.22 QVCGA : -$302.09
PS Ratio SES : 16.19 QVCGA : 0.00
Total Revenue (TTM) SES : $21.92M QVCGA : $9.23B
Gross Profit (TTM) SES : $7.97M QVCGA : $2.89B
EBITDA (TTM) SES : -$68.11M QVCGA : $789.00M

Return for Risk

SES vs. QVCGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SES

SES Risk / Return Rank: 48
SES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SES Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
SES Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SES Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SES Martin Ratio Rank: 44

QVCGA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SES vs. QVCGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SES AI Corp (SES) and QVC Group Inc (QVCGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SES	QVCGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.07	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.91	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.10	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.17	—	—

Drawdowns

SES vs. QVCGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SES drawdown since its inception was -97.58%, which is greater than QVCGA's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SES and QVCGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SES	QVCGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.58%	0.00%	-97.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-91.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-90.39%	0.00%	-90.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.76%	0.00%	-65.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.30%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SES	QVCGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.05%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	76.68%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	106.91%	0.00%	+106.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	114.53%	0.00%	+114.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	111.41%	0.00%	+111.41%

Dividends

SES vs. QVCGA - Dividend Comparison

Neither SES nor QVCGA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials