SERV vs. UMAC
SERV (Serve Robotics Inc) and UMAC (Unusual Machines, Inc) are both stocks. SERV operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while UMAC operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past year, SERV returned -28.66% vs 338.60% for UMAC. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SERV vs. UMAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SERV achieves a -20.62% return, which is significantly lower than UMAC's 126.53% return.
SERV
- 1D
- -9.15%
- 1M
- -11.87%
- YTD
- -20.62%
- 6M
- -30.17%
- 1Y
- -28.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UMAC
- 1D
- -13.64%
- 1M
- 108.98%
- YTD
- 126.53%
- 6M
- 179.92%
- 1Y
- 338.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SERV vs. UMAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SERV Serve Robotics Inc | -20.62% | -23.11% | -46.00% |
UMAC Unusual Machines, Inc | 126.53% | -24.26% | 511.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between SERV and UMAC is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.36 |
The correlation between SERV and UMAC shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SERV:
$620.50M
UMAC:
$1.39B
SERV:
-$2.07
UMAC:
-$0.18
SERV:
105.14
UMAC:
52.90
SERV:
1.95
UMAC:
4.19
SERV:
$5.19M
UMAC:
$17.25M
SERV:
-$22.91M
UMAC:
$5.92M
SERV:
-$138.16M
UMAC:
-$28.96M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SERV vs. UMAC — Risk / Return Rank
SERV
UMAC
SERV vs. UMAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Serve Robotics Inc (SERV) and Unusual Machines, Inc (UMAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SERV | UMAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.34 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 6.48 | -6.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 13.17 | -14.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SERV | UMAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 | 2.51 | -2.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.21 | 1.02 | -1.23 |
Drawdowns
SERV vs. UMAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SERV drawdown since its inception was -92.72%, which is greater than UMAC's maximum drawdown of -75.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SERV and UMAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SERV | UMAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.72% | -75.61% | -17.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.28% | -52.63% | -3.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.04% | -13.64% | -53.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.71% | -44.34% | -17.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.65% | 25.86% | +8.79% |
Volatility
SERV vs. UMAC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Serve Robotics Inc (SERV) is 18.11%, while Unusual Machines, Inc (UMAC) has a volatility of 58.89%. This indicates that SERV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SERV | UMAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.11% | 58.89% | -40.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.67% | 98.43% | -38.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.43% | 137.32% | -47.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 190.06% | 164.16% | +25.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 190.06% | 164.16% | +25.90% |
Dividends
SERV vs. UMAC - Dividend Comparison
Neither SERV nor UMAC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SERV vs. UMAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Serve Robotics Inc and Unusual Machines, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SERV and UMAC have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UMAC has higher volatility (58.89%) compared to SERV (18.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SERV dropped -92.72% vs UMAC's -75.61%.
UMAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SERV and UMAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer