PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEQAX vs. RYMTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEQAX vs. RYMTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim World Equity Income Fund (SEQAX) and Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEQAX achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly higher than RYMTX's 8.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SEQAX has outperformed RYMTX with an annualized return of 9.57%, while RYMTX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.72% annualized return.


SEQAX

1D
1.17%
1M
4.97%
YTD
11.69%
6M
13.11%
1Y
30.48%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
9.57%

RYMTX

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
8.95%
6M
9.75%
1Y
20.00%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
3.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEQAX vs. RYMTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEQAX
Guggenheim World Equity Income Fund
11.69%22.37%5.57%12.10%-9.30%21.30%6.14%21.02%-8.68%14.70%
RYMTX
Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund
8.95%5.52%0.56%3.62%14.75%2.62%2.07%7.18%-7.87%7.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SEQAX and RYMTX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.21

Over the past year, SEQAX and RYMTX have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEQAX vs. RYMTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEQAX
SEQAX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SEQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SEQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

RYMTX
RYMTX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
RYMTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYMTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYMTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
RYMTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYMTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEQAX vs. RYMTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim World Equity Income Fund (SEQAX) and Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEQAXRYMTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.34

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

3.64

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.73

13.88

+0.85

SEQAX vs. RYMTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEQAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the RYMTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEQAX and RYMTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEQAXRYMTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

1.78

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.49

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.35

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.10

+0.39

Drawdowns

SEQAX vs. RYMTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEQAX drawdown since its inception was -52.69%, which is greater than RYMTX's maximum drawdown of -34.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEQAX and RYMTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEQAXRYMTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.69%

-34.19%

-18.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.39%

-5.43%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.63%

-17.54%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.03%

-17.54%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.29%

-17.54%

-17.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.02%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.02%

-18.90%

+7.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

1.42%

+0.67%

Volatility

SEQAX vs. RYMTX - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim World Equity Income Fund (SEQAX) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX) at 1.72%. This indicates that SEQAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYMTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEQAXRYMTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

1.72%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.52%

8.46%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.93%

11.10%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.49%

12.15%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.92%

10.65%

+4.27%

SEQAX vs. RYMTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEQAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RYMTX's 1.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEQAX vs. RYMTX - Dividend Comparison

SEQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.20%, more than RYMTX's 5.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYMTX
Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund
5.53%6.03%5.10%1.02%4.80%0.00%7.56%0.00%0.00%4.70%5.19%2.68%
SEQAX
Guggenheim World Equity Income Fund
13.20%14.91%1.34%1.82%2.16%29.17%1.69%2.45%3.24%2.18%2.32%2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEQAX and RYMTX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEQAX has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to RYMTX (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEQAX dropped -52.69% vs RYMTX's -34.19%.

SEQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEQAX and RYMTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer