PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEPZ vs. TLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SEPZ vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SEPZ vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SEPZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF
-3.17%13.18%18.23%17.94%-3.59%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
1.39%11.36%-2.18%0.73%-11.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEPZ achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly lower than TLTW's 1.39% return.


SEPZ

1D
0.76%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
-3.17%
6M
-1.43%
1Y
12.95%
3Y*
13.33%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*

TLTW

1D
-0.04%
1M
-2.53%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.87%
1Y
6.62%
3Y*
0.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SEPZ vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEPZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SEPZ vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEPZ
SEPZ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SEPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SEPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEPZ vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEPZTLTWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

0.75

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.43

1.05

+0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.14

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.28

+0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.56

3.35

+3.21

SEPZ vs. TLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEPZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the TLTW Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEPZ and TLTW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEPZTLTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

0.75

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

-0.03

+0.92

Correlation

The correlation between SEPZ and TLTW is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SEPZ vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison

SEPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than TLTW's 13.67% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
SEPZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF
2.27%2.20%3.62%3.55%0.69%0.05%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
13.67%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%0.00%

Drawdowns

SEPZ vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEPZ drawdown since its inception was -15.22%, smaller than the maximum TLTW drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEPZ and TLTW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SEPZTLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.22%

-18.61%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.40%

-5.80%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.55%

-3.02%

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-8.49%

+5.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.21%

-0.19%

Volatility

SEPZ vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) at 3.46%. This indicates that SEPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SEPZTLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

3.46%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.52%

5.80%

+1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.16%

8.88%

+5.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.30%

11.55%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.53%

11.55%

+0.98%