SEPZ vs. PMDE
SEPZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF) and PMDE (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December) are both exchange-traded funds - SEPZ is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index September, while PMDE is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY). Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SEPZ charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PMDE.
Performance
SEPZ vs. PMDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEPZ achieves a 7.74% return, which is significantly higher than PMDE's 3.18% return.
SEPZ
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- 7.74%
- 1Y
- 16.03%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- —
PMDE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEPZ vs. PMDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SEPZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF | 7.74% | 0.22% |
PMDE PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December | 3.18% | 0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEPZ and PMDE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEPZ vs. PMDE — Risk / Return Rank
SEPZ
PMDE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SEPZ vs. PMDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December (PMDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEPZ | PMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.13 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEPZ vs. PMDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEPZ drawdown since its inception was -15.22%, which is greater than PMDE's maximum drawdown of -1.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEPZ and PMDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEPZ | PMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | -1.59% | -13.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | 0.00% | -1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -0.24% | -2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | — | — |
Volatility
SEPZ vs. PMDE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEPZ | PMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 2.37% | +8.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.42% | 2.37% | +10.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.48% | 2.37% | +10.11% |
SEPZ vs. PMDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEPZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PMDE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEPZ vs. PMDE - Dividend Comparison
SEPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, while PMDE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMDE PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEPZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF | 2.04% | 2.20% | 3.62% | 3.55% | 0.69% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEPZ and PMDE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PMDE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PMDE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for SEPZ.
SEPZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.00% for PMDE.
SEPZ is categorized as Options Trading, while PMDE is Defined Outcome. SEPZ tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index September, while PMDE tracks SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY). They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SEPZ and 0.50% for PMDE.
Find the right allocation for SEPZ and PMDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer