PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEPZ vs. DIVN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEPZ vs. DIVN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ) and Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEPZ achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly lower than DIVN's 14.80% return.


SEPZ

1D
0.59%
1M
-0.07%
6M
6.07%
YTD
7.08%
1Y
16.22%
3Y*
14.12%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.40%

DIVN

1D
0.20%
1M
1.14%
6M
8.07%
YTD
14.80%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.90M$5.41M$2.61M
$230.97K$255.91K$416.21K

SEPZ vs. DIVN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SEPZ and DIVN is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEPZ vs. DIVN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SEPZ
SEPZ Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SEPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SEPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVN
DIVN Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DIVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVN Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVN Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SEPZ vs. DIVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ) and Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEPZDIVNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.39

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

4.08

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

11.49

-3.70

SEPZ vs. DIVN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEPZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the DIVN Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEPZ and DIVN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEPZ vs. DIVN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEPZ drawdown since its inception was -15.22%, which is greater than DIVN's maximum drawdown of -5.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEPZ and DIVN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEPZDIVNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.22%

-5.55%

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.30%

-5.55%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-1.39%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.82%

-1.35%

-1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.97%

-0.15%

Volatility

SEPZ vs. DIVN - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ) and Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) have volatilities of 3.06% and 3.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEPZDIVNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

3.15%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.53%

7.55%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.99%

10.52%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.41%

10.53%

+1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.48%

10.53%

+1.95%

SEPZ vs. DIVN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEPZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVN's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEPZ vs. DIVN - Dividend Comparison

SEPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than DIVN's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DIVN
Horizon Dividend Income ETF
3.70%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEPZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF
2.05%2.20%3.62%3.55%0.69%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEPZ and DIVN have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVN has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to SEPZ (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEPZ dropped -15.22% vs DIVN's -5.55%.

On 1-year performance, DIVN leads with 22.54% vs 16.22% for SEPZ. On fees, DIVN is cheaper at 0.70% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DIVN has performed better with a 22.54% return vs 16.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVN is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for SEPZ.

DIVN has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 2.05% for SEPZ.

SEPZ is categorized as Options Trading, while DIVN is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SEPZ and 0.70% for DIVN.

DIVN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEPZ and DIVN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer