PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEPW vs. AMZY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEPW vs. AMZY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Sep ETF (SEPW) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEPW achieves a 3.80% return, which is significantly higher than AMZY's 1.82% return.


SEPW

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.55%
YTD
3.80%
6M
4.23%
1Y
12.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMZY

1D
-2.70%
1M
-8.38%
YTD
1.82%
6M
2.92%
1Y
12.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEPW vs. AMZY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SEPW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Sep ETF
3.80%10.42%11.05%3.74%
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
1.82%10.39%35.28%9.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SEPW and AMZY is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2023

0.61

The correlation between SEPW and AMZY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEPW vs. AMZY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEPW
SEPW Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SEPW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEPW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEPW Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SEPW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEPW Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZY
AMZY Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
AMZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZY Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEPW vs. AMZY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Sep ETF (SEPW) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEPWAMZYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.11

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.90

0.61

+3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.17

1.52

+18.65

SEPW vs. AMZY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEPW Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the AMZY Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEPW and AMZY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEPWAMZYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

0.51

+2.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.66

0.91

+0.74

Drawdowns

SEPW vs. AMZY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEPW drawdown since its inception was -8.43%, smaller than the maximum AMZY drawdown of -23.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEPW and AMZY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEPWAMZYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.43%

-23.70%

+15.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.19%

-19.61%

+16.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-9.08%

+8.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.64%

-5.33%

+4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

7.91%

-7.29%

Volatility

SEPW vs. AMZY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Sep ETF (SEPW) is 0.64%, while YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that SEPW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEPWAMZYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

6.57%

-5.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.44%

16.35%

-12.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.72%

23.76%

-19.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.45%

25.09%

-18.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.45%

25.09%

-18.64%

SEPW vs. AMZY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEPW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEPW vs. AMZY - Dividend Comparison

SEPW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.35%.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
54.35%52.59%47.91%9.90%
SEPW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Sep ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEPW and AMZY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZY has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to SEPW (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEPW dropped -8.43% vs AMZY's -23.70%.

On 1-year performance, SEPW leads with 12.39% vs 12.00% for AMZY. On fees, SEPW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, SEPW has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SEPW has performed better with a 12.39% return vs 12.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEPW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZY.

AMZY has the higher dividend yield at 54.35%, compared with 0.00% for SEPW.

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SEPW and 0.99% for AMZY.

SEPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEPW and AMZY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer