PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEPT vs. SIXO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEPT vs. SIXO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF (SEPT) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEPT achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly higher than SIXO's 4.06% return.


SEPT

1D
0.41%
1M
1.00%
6M
6.79%
YTD
7.81%
1Y
16.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.14%

SIXO

1D
0.33%
1M
0.74%
6M
3.15%
YTD
4.06%
1Y
8.51%
3Y*
8.97%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$23.24K$34.03K$1.41M
$680.56K$749.65K$3.32M

SEPT vs. SIXO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SEPT
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF
7.81%14.95%16.43%4.51%
SIXO
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF
4.06%7.19%12.22%2.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SEPT and SIXO is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2023

0.87

The correlation between SEPT and SIXO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEPT vs. SIXO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SEPT
SEPT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SEPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEPT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SEPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEPT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SIXO
SIXO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SIXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SEPT vs. SIXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF (SEPT) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEPTSIXODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.31

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

1.98

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

7.49

+7.03

SEPT vs. SIXO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the SIXO Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEPT and SIXO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEPT vs. SIXO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEPT drawdown since its inception was -12.83%, which is greater than SIXO's maximum drawdown of -12.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEPT and SIXO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEPTSIXODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.83%

-12.04%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.39%

-4.13%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-1.95%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

1.09%

-0.02%

Volatility

SEPT vs. SIXO - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF (SEPT) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) at 0.84%. This indicates that SEPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEPTSIXODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

0.84%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.68%

3.80%

+1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.51%

5.25%

+2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.70%

8.95%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.70%

8.95%

+0.75%

SEPT vs. SIXO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SEPT and SIXO have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

SEPT vs. SIXO - Dividend Comparison

Neither SEPT nor SIXO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SEPT and SIXO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEPT has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to SIXO (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEPT dropped -12.83% vs SIXO's -12.04%.

On 1-year performance, SEPT leads with 16.81% vs 8.51% for SIXO. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, SIXO has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SEPT has performed better with a 16.81% return vs 8.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEPT and SIXO have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

SEPT and SIXO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

SEPT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SIXO is Options Trading.

SEPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEPT and SIXO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer