PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEPT vs. APRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEPT vs. APRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF (SEPT) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEPT achieves a 6.29% return, which is significantly higher than APRB's 4.77% return.


SEPT

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.40%
YTD
6.29%
6M
6.89%
1Y
19.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRB

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.69%
YTD
4.77%
6M
5.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEPT vs. APRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SEPT
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF
6.29%2.74%
APRB
Aptus April Buffer ETF
4.77%2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SEPT and APRB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEPT vs. APRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEPT
SEPT Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SEPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEPT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SEPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEPT Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

APRB
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEPT vs. APRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF (SEPT) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEPTAPRBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.48

SEPT vs. APRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEPTAPRBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

2.00

-0.41

Drawdowns

SEPT vs. APRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEPT drawdown since its inception was -12.83%, which is greater than APRB's maximum drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEPT and APRB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEPTAPRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.83%

-4.59%

-8.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.11%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-0.74%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

Volatility

SEPT vs. APRB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEPTAPRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.49%

5.98%

+1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.87%

5.98%

+3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.87%

5.98%

+3.89%

SEPT vs. APRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEPT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than APRB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEPT vs. APRB - Dividend Comparison

Neither SEPT nor APRB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SEPT and APRB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SEPT.

SEPT and APRB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SEPT and 0.25% for APRB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEPT and APRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer